ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.

About our authors.

Get EWG blog badges.

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign up here to stay informed. YouTube
Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page

Twitter

    FEED

     Enviroblog in your Reader

    Enviroblog by Email

    Mixed Greens
    An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.

    Top Blog Award

    Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

    Dear CEO: It's time to reduce children's exposure to BPA

    Time to say goodbye

    9 safer shopping tips from the pros @ Skin Deep

    FEATURED

    Dear CEO: It's time to reduce children's exposure to BPA

    So what products CAN we use?

    Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

    EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

    It's practically summer: Quick, Grab the (safe) sunscreen

    EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

    Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

    EWG on TV

    Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

    Toxic Tub?

    Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

    Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

    BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?

    Ask EWG Archives

    SEARCH

    ARCHIVE

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

    « Want PFCs with that? | Main | EnviroLinks: Lassie's got nothin' on this girl »

    The art and science of smells

    By Olga Naidenko

    March 4, 2008

    deodorant.jpgThe creation and use of fragrances and cosmetics is one of most ancient arts known to humans. Just think of the diverse tribal cultures that use facial and body painting, or recall the stories of the glamor of Cleopatra and the (in)famously luxurious Roman parties drenched in rose perfumes. In the natural world as well, colorful (peacocks) or highly odorous (musk deer) males do everything in their power to attract females.

    Fast forwarding from the time of Cleopatra to the twenty-first century, we see that fragrance and cosmetics products have become a billion-dollar industry, promoted by stars of fashion and eagerly purchased by consumers all around the world. The key part that changed is the transition from naturally occurring ingredients in cosmetics to synthetic ingredients that, as readers of the Enviroblog well know, are not currently regulated for safety to human health.

    These synthetic fragrance chemicals bear unpronounceable names, such as galaxolide, tonalide, musk xylene, musk ketone, linalol, lilial, or phenylethyl alcohol. In the Wild West of the cosmetics industry, consumers are left to fend for themselves when choosing amongst the potential dangers these ingredients may pose.

    Many scientists and public health advocates express grave concern about this lack of government or public oversight for the cosmetics industry. Yet, whatever scientists say, people will continue using fragrances and cosmetics – to feel better about themselves, to conform with the social standards, and, of course, to attract potential mates. So, for this blog post, instead of sympathizing with the plight of fragrance-sensitive individuals (of whom I am one) or worrying about cosmetics ingredients going down into the wastewater stream, I will focus on the “individual olfactory signature” that is unique to each human being and every forest mouse.

    Chemosensory recognition (or, in plain language, how the other individual smells) is important not only for identifying plants, animals, objects, or people. Body odors regulate the social, sexual, and endocrine responses of many species. Partner choice in mammals is influenced by the smell of air-born chemicals that convey a wealth of information, such as the sex, age, health and reproductive state, all of which contribute to the odor profile of the animal.

    As an immunologist, I have been long fascinated with one particular research finding on smell signaling. It turns out that the immune make up of a person plays a role in mate selection. What immune genes a person has influences how they smell –- and which other individuals may find them attractive. On average, human subjects rate the odors of other individuals as more pleasant if they have less immune gene similarity rather than a high degree of similarity. Even though human mate choice is rather difficult to study, this research does support the long-standing notion of “chemistry” in a relationship.

    So how do synthetic or plant-derived fragrances affect this natural process of mate selection based on immune fitness? At the moment, we don’t know, but it sure would be interesting to find out!

    « Want PFCs with that? |