ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Rock star in action | Main | Confidential information »
A silent killer
In 2002, when EWG was first to report that state scientists estimated airborne dust and soot causes more deaths of Californians each year than AIDS, homicide and traffic accidents combined, the press, politicians and even some other environmental groups were skeptical. Surely that's too high, they said; you can't count every person whose life may be shortened a few months or years by breathing dirty air.
Six years later, reams of new evidence show that the estimate was indeed off. The actual number is three times higher. That means that airborne dust and soot – the kind of particulate pollution scientists call PM 2.5 – is responsible for the deaths of more than 24,000 Californians a year.
"Particle pollution is a silent killer," state Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said after reading the ARB staff's latest report.
There's a clear link between levels of the tiny particles – 2.5 microns or less, much thinner than a human hair – and cardiovascular deaths, Marla Cone reported in the LA Times.
The studies, including one by USC tracking 23,000 people in greater Los Angeles, and another by the American Cancer Society monitoring 300,000 people across the United States, have found rates of heart attacks, strokes and other serious disease increase exponentially after exposure to even slightly higher amounts of metal or dust. It is difficult to attribute individual deaths to particulate pollution, [said Bart Croes, chief researcher for the California Air Resources Board], but he said long-term studies that account for smoking, obesity and other risks have increasingly zeroed in on fine particulate pollution as a killer."There's no death certificate that says specifically someone died of air pollution, but cities with higher rates of air pollution have much greater rates of death from cardiovascular diseases," he said.
Californians exposed to high levels of fine particulates had their lives cut short on average by 10 years, the board staff found. Researchers also found that when particulates are cut even temporarily, death rates fall. "When Dublin imposed a coal ban, when Hong Kong imposed reductions in sulfur dioxide, when there was a steel mill strike in Utah . . . they saw immediate reductions in deaths," Croes said.
But there is good news, reported Jane Kay in the San Francisco Chronicle:
The drop in fine particulates statewide in the last decade, particularly in cities, has been 30 percent. One region that saw even greater improvement, the San Joaquin Valley, decreased 45 percent over the same time period due to new regulations, according to state air officials.
California already has the world's strictest standards for particulate pollution, although they're only non-binding goals. The same day the state's report was issued, the Air Resources Board met in Fresno and adopted a plan to push the San Joaquin Valley to meet those goals. But air quality activists are worried that the state's plan relies too much on voluntary reductions of diesel emissions by the trucking industry, and in light of the sharply higher death estimate they urged the state to go even further.
"Send this plan back to be strengthened or do it yourself," said Melissa Kelly-Ortega, program coordinator for the Merced-Mariposa Asthma Coalition. "You [ARB] will be saving lives."
That's no longer in dispute. The only question is how many lives the state is determined to save.
You can read the state's study here.
Re-entrained roadway pollution is a health epedemic and it is getting worse. Don't you find it interesting that tailpipe emissions are getting cleaner, we are driving more miles and particule pollution is increasing.
Roadway dust, brake wear and tire wear and being resuspended everytime a car travels over the roadway. In areas where traffic is heavy and people are living near these roadways, a significant health risk is present.
We must insist that the policy makers address this issue by enforcing standards for re=entrained roadway pollution