ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG TODAY

We need you to help protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

ENVIROBLOG TO YOU

 Enviroblog in your Reader

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act YouTube
Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page

Twitter

    More health problems for asbestos victims?

    SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

    FIND PAST POSTS

    FEATURED

    Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

    Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

    So what products CAN we use?

    Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

    EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

    EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

    Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

    EWG on TV

    Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

    Toxic Tub?

    Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

    Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

    BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?

    Ask EWG Archives

    Top Blog Award

    Top  blogs award

    PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

    Breast Cancer Fund

    The Daily Green

    Eco Child's Play

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Green Moms Carnival

    Grist

    Healthy Child, Healthy World

    Huffington Post Green

    NRDC's Switchboard

    Organic.org

    Safer States

    TreeHugger

    TALK TO US

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

    Monthly Archive


    Australian asbestos exporter lobbies Congress for "no fault" legislation before American victims can be compensated

    By EWG

    February 23, 2005

    In the wake of the W.R. Grace indictment for asbestos poisoning in Libby, Mont., Australian building products company James Hardie Industries is working hard to make sure it escapes responsibility for asbestos building products and brake linings it exported to the U.S. from the 1960s to the 1980s.

    The company has hired Washington influence peddling firm Shea and Gardner – a subsidiary of Goodwin Proctor – to push its powerful Republican contacts for legislation establishing President Bush’s $140 billion scheme to eliminate asbestos lawsuits.

    Hardie’s newfound interest in American politics comes after The Australian broke the story last week of Hardie’s asbestos dealings, plus a secret payout to an American victim from one of Hardie’s former subsidiaries. Just before Christmas, Hardie also agreed to a $1.5 billion (Australian) fund for Australian victims of products it manufactured until 1987.

    Unfortunately for Hardie, that will likely not be enough to cover the potential American lawsuits, said Steve Kazan, whose Oakland-based firm has decided to pursue this case. Kazan said, however, that he and his colleagues will be “quite happy” to sue Hardie’s registered U.S. subsidiaries on behalf of the sick and dying when and if the trust fund is exhausted. This move should help to prevent Hardie from hiding behind the Australian government, which the company is lobbying for protection through legislation allowing only Australians to covered by the compensation fund.

    For more information on asbestos and industry’s efforts to avoid caring for those it poisoned, please see EWG’s studies A Slow Death in Texas and Asbestos: Think Again.


    Fire retardants found in Canadian foods

    By EWG

    February 17, 2005

    New tests by Toronto’s Globe and Mail and CTV News show some of the world’s highest levels of chemical fire retardants in common Canadian foods. The search for likely sources of the chemicals began when fire retardants were found in breast milk in studies beginning in 2003.

    Though the effects of these chemicals, called PBDEs, on humans are uncertain, in animal tests they affect memory and learning, and can alter thyroid hormone levels, which may stunt growth. Toddlers and breast-feeding infants are most at risk.

    Fire retardants were found in almost all the 13 foods tested, including farmed rainbow trout, farmed Atlantic salmon, sausage, butter, cheese and milk. The chemicals were not found in chicken. Fire retardants and other environmental toxins accumulate in fat, so leaner foods generally have lower levels of chemicals.

    The levels in individual foods were low, but because fire retardants accumulate in the body, exposure over a long period of time could lead to developmental problems, possibly including disorders such as ADHD. PBDEs may pose the same threats to humans as a related family of chemicals, carcinogenic PCBs, which were banned in the 1970s after they were found to cause birth defects and neurological disorders and increase the risk of some cancers.

    The Environmental Working Group performed tests for PBDEs on household dust in 2004, finding three prevalent fire retardants: Octa, Penta and Deca. The federal government removed the first two from the market at the end of 2004, but EWG’s results found the third, Deca, to be the predominant contaminant in half its sampled homes. Deca also breaks down into the other two forms of PBDEs, rendering their removal useless without their cohort.

    To view EWG’s studies on toxic fire retardants, please visit EWG's reports In the Dust and Mothers’ Milk.

    New Hampshire Determined to Limit Mercury Emissions, Despite Federal Stalling

    By EWG

    February 11, 2005

    With the Bush administration dragging its heels on limiting mercury emissions from power plants, concerned New Hampshire citizens are calling for legislation independent of federal regulations, the New Hampshire Union Leader reports. A new bill in the state Senate requires an 80 percent reduction in mercury emissions in eight years, as well as a cap on carbon dioxide.

    New Hampshire’s clean-up efforts come in response to a federal proposal allowing a cap-and-trade for mercury emissions that was expected in December, but delayed. Conservationists will likely challenge the rule in court if it’s enacted, but nothing can be done until then, conveniently leaving mercury up in the air — and continuing to seep into our water.

    New Hampshire and a coalition of other Northeastern states on the receiving end of pollution from power plants in the West want plants held to the emissions standards of the Clean Air Act, which requires them to install pollution reduction equipment. Other bills in the state legislature deal with banning mercury in landfills and consumer goods.

    The Environmental Working Group performed a year-long study that found a signature metabolic link between mercury and autism. The group has also studied mercury in seafood, finding dangerous levels in several types of fish, particularly canned albacore tuna.

    Mercury exposure causes neurological and developmental problems in children, but kids and pregnant mothers aren’t the only ones who should limit their consumption. A new Finnish study found that eating fish with high mercury levels puts middle-aged men at greater risk for heart attack and stroke.

    View EWG’s studies on mercury and autism, mercury in seafood, and mercury pollution from coal-burning power plants.

    Farmed Fish Consumption Rising – Along With PCBs

    By EWG

    February 1, 2005


    The Washington Post reports that half the fish consumed worldwide will be farm-raised instead of wild-caught by the year 2025, exposing Americans to more fish with plenty of healthy omega-3s—and dangerous levels of toxic PCBs.

    With an eye toward the U.S.’s $8 billion seafood trade deficit and increasing worldwide demand, the Bush administration is pushing to quintuple aquaculture yields by the same year. While fish farming provides more affordable seafood and takes the pressure off tapped-out wild stocks, current practices too often ignore aquaculture’s health and environmental costs.

    The Environmental Working Group conducted studies on farmed salmon from grocery stores and found on average 16 times the dioxin-like PCBs found in wild salmon. Farmed salmon is likely the most PCB-contaminated protein source in the U.S. food supply. PCBs cause cancer and were banned in the United States in 1976.

    Fish farming also harms ecosystems by releasing nutrients, waste, chemicals, and escaped domestic fish into oceans.

    To read EWG’s study on farm-raised salmon, please visit www.ewg.org/reports/farmedPCBs/es.php.

    More health problems for asbestos victims?

    By EWG

    February 1, 2005

    Researchers at the University of Missouri have discovered a possible link between asbestos and autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.



    It is well-documented that asbestos exposure leads to fatal diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma, but this new information raises even more questions about health problems related to asbestos. There is currently an effort afoot in Congress to pass a bill that would bail out asbestos companies and their insurers by creating an inadequate trust fund for asbestos victims and take away their right to sue companies that knowingly exposed them to asbestos for decades.



    The asbestos epidemic should be considered a health problem, not a financial one. Any solution to the asbestos epidemic, be it litigation, a trust fund, or a combination of the two, must help everyone hurt by asbestos.


    « January 2005 | Main | March 2005 »