ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG TODAY

We need you to help protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

ENVIROBLOG TO YOU

 Enviroblog in your Reader

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

You could (almost) eat this furniture

Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?

Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox

Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

select month July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004

FEATURED

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Fire retardants found in Canadian foods | Main | DuPont Agrees to Settlement After Poisoning Drinking Water »

Australian asbestos exporter lobbies Congress for "no fault" legislation before American victims can be compensated

In the wake of the W.R. Grace indictment for asbestos poisoning in Libby, Mont., Australian building products company James Hardie Industries is working hard to make sure it escapes responsibility for asbestos building products and brake linings it exported to the U.S. from the 1960s to the 1980s.

The company has hired Washington influence peddling firm Shea and Gardner – a subsidiary of Goodwin Proctor – to push its powerful Republican contacts for legislation establishing President Bush’s $140 billion scheme to eliminate asbestos lawsuits.

Hardie’s newfound interest in American politics comes after The Australian broke the story last week of Hardie’s asbestos dealings, plus a secret payout to an American victim from one of Hardie’s former subsidiaries. Just before Christmas, Hardie also agreed to a $1.5 billion (Australian) fund for Australian victims of products it manufactured until 1987.

Unfortunately for Hardie, that will likely not be enough to cover the potential American lawsuits, said Steve Kazan, whose Oakland-based firm has decided to pursue this case. Kazan said, however, that he and his colleagues will be “quite happy” to sue Hardie’s registered U.S. subsidiaries on behalf of the sick and dying when and if the trust fund is exhausted. This move should help to prevent Hardie from hiding behind the Australian government, which the company is lobbying for protection through legislation allowing only Australians to covered by the compensation fund.

For more information on asbestos and industry’s efforts to avoid caring for those it poisoned, please see EWG’s studies A Slow Death in Texas and Asbestos: Think Again.

« Fire retardants found in Canadian foods |