ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.

About our authors.


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Healthy Home Tips for Parents

    Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics

    Please don't disrupt my endocrines!

    Taking pollution personally


    FEATURED

    Please don't disrupt my endocrines!

    Healthy home tips for parents

    Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square

    Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs



    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Lax Enforcement on Mercury Pollution Controls Linked to Economic Losses | Main | New Study Finds Chemical Cocktail in Household Dust »

    Bush administration, ACC battle EU cosmetic safety laws

    By EWG

    March 17, 2005

    Not content to pander to the cosmetics industry by requiring no safety testing on American personal care products, the Bush administration is now working to thwart Europe’s attempts at improving product safety. Government correspondence uncovered by staff of the House Committee on Government Reform shows that the administration mixed with the American Chemistry Council (ACC) for a lobbying campaign to cripple Europe’s new laws, the Oakland Tribune reports.

    This is a lot of effort for a relatively toothless policy, showing once again how little interest the Bush administration and the ACC have in protecting human health if it means the slightest expense to industry.

    The chemicals Europe’s new laws regulate don’t show up in very many products, so banning them won’t have much practical effect. Also, Europe’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) policy doesn’t require that manufacturers of the most hazardous types of chemicals – those that have been linked to cancer, are bioaccumulative or cause reproductive or developmental problems – stop producing these toxics. They just have to prove that no alternative exists before they can sell them, and then show that they’ve reduced harm by “all technical means.”

    Still, REACH attempts to set at least some safety guidelines, and it allows regulators to ban whole classes of chemicals at once. That’s more than can be said for the U.S. FDA, which allows a self-regulated, industry-sponsored panel to set its own safety standards and do its own testing.

    The Environmental Working Group petitioned FDA last June to set up its own independent advisory panel to regulate product safety, and to enforce provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that require products with untested ingredients to bear a consumer label to that effect.

    For more information, please visit EWG’s Skin Deep report.

    « Lax Enforcement on Mercury Pollution Controls Linked to Economic Losses |