ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross

    House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging

    Chemical injections in Colorado


    FEATURED

    BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

    Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

    BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

    Your BPA questions, answered



    Ask EWG

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Pesticides Linked to Increase in Canine Cancer and Hermaphroditic Frogs | Main | California Paper Looks at One Family's Body Burden »

    March 11, 2005

    GAO Clears the Air on EPA Pollution Analysis

    The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) took the EPA to task this week for using fuzzy math and ignoring health effects to bolster President Bush’s cap-and-trade proposal for mercury emissions from power plants, The Washington Post reports. The EPA skewed its analysis to indicate that the administration’s proposal would garner greater savings than enforcing pollution caps on all plants, the technology-based plan favored by conservationists.

    The EPA cooked its books by including savings from the Clear Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), a cap-and-trade proposal to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. The agency estimated savings of $55 billion to $68 billion for the cap-and-trade, or market-based, mercury proposal, well above the $13 billion savings released for the technology-based plan. EPA also used what the GAO’s report characterized as uncertain, “last-resort” methods for calculating the value of reduced mercury emissions, and failed to account for the health effects of mercury on women of childbearing age and children.

    The GAO’s rebuke comes on the heels of a report from EPA’s inspector general stating that EPA scientists had been pressured to mold their findings to support the industry-backed cap-and-trade proposal.

    President Bush’s “Clear Skies” air pollution bill was defeated by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Wednesday, at least temporarily allaying fears that the EPA’s distorted mercury analysis may have been a ploy to help push the bill through Congress.

    Mercury causes developmental and neurological problems in children and fetuses and increased risk of heart attack and stroke in middle-aged men. Exposure has also been linked to autism. Pregnant women and children should moderate their consumption of some types of fish, including tuna, which are particularly high in mercury. For more information, please see the Environmental Working Group’s reports, New Government Fish Tests Raise Mercury Concerns and Overloaded? Mercury and Autism.

    « Pesticides Linked to Increase in Canine Cancer and Hermaphroditic Frogs |