ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross

    House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging

    Chemical injections in Colorado


    FEATURED

    BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

    Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

    BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

    Your BPA questions, answered



    Ask EWG

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Conservatives for Conservation | Main | Bush Admits Energy Bill Won’t Lower Gas Prices »

    April 14, 2005

    Energy Bill Debate Highlights Phantom Restrictions on Domestic Oil and Gas Exploration

    During debate over the energy bill in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on Tuesday, Representatives Hall, Green, Murphy, Rogers, Pickering, and Committee Chair Barton, among others, voiced their opposition to any restrictions on future oil and gas exploration within the United States. The committee majority shot down a number of minority amendments, including an amendment by Rep. Stupak of Michigan to prohibit directional, slant, or offshore oil and gas drilling on the Great Lakes. Although Rep. Rogers of Michigan opposed the amendment because he felt the states had already dealt with the issue, others criticized Rep. Stupak’s attempt to prevent drilling in the first place. “I don’t think we should be closing off areas to production,” stated Rep. Pickering of Mississippi. Rep. Pickering added that oil and gas companies need more access to public lands, not less, in order to increase the energy supply of the United States.

    According to a recent report by the Environmental Working Group, Rep. Pickering is dead wrong in his assessment of extractive industry access to public lands. This report claims that oil, gas, and mining interests have been gaining access for the past fifty years. Furthermore, when past and current exploration leases are combined, the extractive industry has controlled or currently controls land that is within five miles of 95% of all national parks, wilderness areas, national forests, and other national treasures.

    If oil and gas companies already have access, why aren’t energy prices going down? The EWG report shows that the amount of fossil fuels that are economically recoverable from these natural areas is so small that it has had no significant effect on domestic oil and gas prices. Thousands of land leases remain untouched because the prices of oil and gas are not high enough to justify the cost of exploration, from an industry perspective. We can either wait for the extractive industry to destroy our national treasures as energy prices go through the roof, or we can reduce energy consumption and invest in renewable energy sources while simultaneously protecting our most cherished American wildlands.

    « Conservatives for Conservation |