ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross

    House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging

    Chemical injections in Colorado


    FEATURED

    BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

    Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

    BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

    Your BPA questions, answered



    Ask EWG

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Limbaugh Falsely Claims Feds Spend As Much on Environment as on Defense and Homeland Security | Main | Federal Court Holds MTBE Polluters Responsible »

    May 5, 2005

    Farm Subsidies Contradict Food Pyramid Recommendations

    USDA’s new food pyramid encourages Americans to make fruits and vegetables the lion’s share of their diets, but this policy, the Chicago Tribune points out, doesn’t stack up with the crops the agency pays farmers to grow.

    Corn and soybeans, two heavily subsidized crops, factor into the pyramid’s recommendations in their whole forms, but most supplies go into artificial sweeteners and partially hydrogenated oils for packaged foods that USDA tells consumers to avoid, or are used as feed for cows, pigs and chickens. (The pyramid touts fish and beans as better protein sources.)

    Rice, wheat and sugar, other subsidy all-stars, all took a hit under the new pyramid, which not only recommends eating less of the bread group as a whole, but advises shoppers to switch to whole grains for at least half their servings – not good news for commodities that get lots of mileage from sugary sweets, cereals and packaged snacks.

    Mindful of President Bush’s February proposal to trim farm subsidies – and his subsequent retreat as big agriculture lashed out against it – USDA must walk a fine line between advising an increasingly obese population to make better food choices and pandering to the farm lobbies.

    Farm subsidies are already unfairly skewed toward big agricultural conglomerates, hurting the family farmers they were designed to protect. Now that USDA’s own data show that those subsidized corporations are also producing foods consumers should eat less of, Americans have just one more reason to ask what our tax dollars are paying for, and why.

    For more information on who gets the ag dollars in your state, please visit EWG’s Farm Subsidy Database.

    « Limbaugh Falsely Claims Feds Spend As Much on Environment as on Defense and Homeland Security |