ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Toxins in our Kids' Foods: Where is the FDA?

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Fluoride in Your Water: How much is too much?

Borax: Not the Green Alternative It's Cracked Up to Be

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Healthy Home Tips

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

Monthly Archive


Congress Blocks Ideologues From Health Agencies

By EWG

January 6, 2006

Maybe President Bush still had a New Year’s hangover when he signed this particular appropriations bill into law on January 3rd. The bill funding the Health and Human Services Agency contained a tiny rider (compliments of Sen. Durbin of Ill.) that means agencies like the FDA, NIH, and CDC may actually get back to using science to protect public health. The rider says that political ideology can’t be a hiring criteria, and that sins of scientific omission and commission in the service of political goals will not be tolerated. The Union of Concerned Scientists breaks the news here.

FDA: We Don't Know What's in Tuna Cans

By EWG

January 4, 2006

Apparently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relies on the same sources of information as the general public to learn what's in popular foods: the newspaper. Just two weeks after the Chicago Tribune ran a three-part series on mercury in seafood (including findings in locally purchased fish), top FDA mercury official David Acheson admitted that the FDA didn't know that canned light tuna can contain yellowfin tuna, which is especially high in toxic mercury.

The heavy metal mercury gets into our bodies from seafood consumption and harms the brains of developing children and babies. Public health groups have long urged the FDA to provide clear warnings to women of childbearing age about how much seafood they can safely eat.

The Tribune reports: "We will definitely look at it through our office of seafood and determine whether there is something that requires further pursuit," Acheson said. He could not say exactly what the investigation would entail or whether the agency would conduct additional testing of canned tuna.

Environmental Working Group researchers exposed the FDA's coverup of their own focus group results in which Agency scientists warned women about mercury in tuna. To see how much tuna you can safely eat to keep your level of mercury at a safe level, use EWG's tuna calculator: http://www.ewg.org/issues/mercury/20031209/calculator.php

To read EWG's research, please visit http://www.ewg.org/issues/siteindex/issues.php?issueid=5010.

« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »