ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross

    House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging

    Chemical injections in Colorado


    FEATURED

    BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

    Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

    BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

    Your BPA questions, answered



    Ask EWG

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Grassley: Will We Help Everybody in the Food Supply? | Main | Vinegar for Whiter Whites? »

    June 8, 2006

    Consumer Reports supports EWG findings

    The magazine Consumer Reports is warning pregnant women not to eat
    any tuna at all because the government can't assure us that even
    supposedly-safe light tuna won't contain excessive levels of mercury, which
    harms developing brains.

    As reported in the Chicago Tribune:

    "This is important information that women need to hear," said Jean Halloran, the director of food policy at Consumers Union and a member of an FDA advisory panel on mercury in seafood. "We think that high exposures, even for a day or two, could be too much of a risk."

    Consumer Reports bases its advice on a powerful investigation by the Chicago Tribune last winter finding that some light tuna, which on average appears to be lower in mercury than albacore tuna, actually contained more mercury than the albacore. The Tribune also quotes an FDA official admitting that they kept light tuna on the
    low-mercury/low-concern list for consumers in order to protect tuna companies.

    Environmental Working Group (EWG) researchers have pressured the Food and
    Drug Administration for years to give women of childbearing age clear,
    accurate advice about which fish to eat or avoid, ultimately coming up with
    a fish list (link) and a tuna calculator that lets them see based on their
    weight how much tuna they can safely eat.

    Click here to see all of EWG's research on mercury in seafood.

    « Grassley: Will We Help Everybody in the Food Supply? |