ABOUT

Enviroblog is a project of Environmental Working Group, covering public health, environmental policy, and better
consumer choices. (Meet our authors here.)

TIPS

Did we miss something? Email Amanda.

BLOGROLL

FEED

 Subscribe in a reader

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up below for EWG's bimonthly email updates.

Childhood obesity increases dramatically

Prenatal PFC exposure:
The weight just won't stick

SMM: iCount video bonanza

ARCHIVE

select month August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004

SEARCH

« Like Mother, Like Baby | Main | Organic Fast Food Coming to NYC »

July 17, 2006

The bottle-versus-the-tap debate

Today, The L.A. Times reveals that consumers spend 10 billion dollars annually on bottled water which undergoes a far less scrupulous testing regimen than big-city tap water systems. Municipalities are required to test for fecal coliform bacteria over 100 times per month and to make their results public, while bottled water facilities are only required to perform these tests once weekly and do not have to publicize their findings. This information--coupled with a June United Nations Environmental Program report finding an average of 46,000 pieces of plastic debris floating near the surface of every square mile of ocean--may be good encouragement to stick with tap water.

Sally Squires, author of the LA Times piece, suggests drinking your water--whether bottled or tap-- cold, for improved taste.

Oregon Mail Tribune: How pure is bottled water?

« Like Mother, Like Baby |