ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls
FEATURED
Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health
Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?
Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« Are the National Academies Fair and Balanced? | Main | Friday Round-Up »
Too Much of a Good Thing

A new report from the World Health Organization reminds us that we can have too much of a good thing. The report states that 60,000 lives are claimed each year from excessive sun exposure—the majority of the deaths from skin cancers caused by UV radiation. What does the WHO say are the best ways to minimize your risk? Limiting time in the midday sun, wearing protective clothing, using sunscreen with a minimum SPF of 15, and staying away from the tanning salon.
Funny—they forgot to mention this hi-tech bikini with built in alarm and UV meter that rates the intensity of the sun's rays on a scale of 1 to 20. The swimsuit, which sells for $190, goes on sale next month.
Comments
The conclusions drawn from the WHO report seem somewhat one sided the other side, the beneficial effect of sunshine is detailed here in SUNLIGHT ROBBERY:
http://www.healthresearchforum.org.uk/reports/sunlightrobbery.pdf
While it is true that the number and severity of sunburn incidents is associated with an increased risk of melanoma it is also true that more people suffer from a lack of sunshine and insufficient vitamin d status.
This research http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16872022&query_hl=16&itool=pubmed_docsum shows that 47% of girls in Ireland may have inadequate vitamin d reserves in the Winter and This research,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=15714215 using a slightly higher and more appropriate indicator of vitamin d insufficiency status concludes More than one-third of the adolescent girls have vitamin D status below 25 nmol/l and almost all are below 50 nmol/l. Two-thirds of the elderly community-dwelling women have vitamin D status below 50 nmol/l.
Rather than warning people of the dangers of sunbathing it would be better if you could advise them of the importance of getting regular but limited exposure to sunshine whenever they can, though of course stressing that getting sunburnt is always to be avoided.
Posted by: Ted Hutchinson | July 30, 2006 4:09 PM
Ted,
Balancing the benefits of Vitamin D (bone formation that prevents rickets in children) with its drawbacks (skin cancer) is a challenging public health question at this time.
Although only limited national data on rickets is available from a 2001 CDC report on this topic (http://tinyurl.com/7x2zj), 9 cases/million children were diagnosed with rickets between 1990 and 1998. 75% of these were African-American. The experts concluded that high skin pigmentation combined with low milk consumption (due to perceived or actual lactose intolerance) contributed to the high rates of incidence among this population.
For Caucasian children, the one expert concluded that 30 minutes /week of full body exposure (diaper only) or 2 hours/week of partial (clothed, no hat) was sufficient. However, there was insufficient data on African-American children to draw conclusions.
The panelists also concluded that for a healthy adult, a five-minute exposure (to one MED) 2-3 times/week is sufficient to stimulate enough Vitamin D production for Caucasians. African-Americans need 10 times more sunlight to form similar amounts of Vitamin D.
Using Irish data for U.S. exposures is an invalid comparison--Ireland receives much less sunlight than any state in the U.S. (except Alaska).
As for skin cancer, in 1998 there were 51,400 new cases of skin cancer and 7,800 deaths. The incidence rate for Caucasians is 14/100,000. This incidence rate is more than a factor of 10 (because there are less children than adults) greater than the rickets incidence rate. For African-Americans, the incidence rate is 2/100,000--again higher than the incidence of rickets.
Clearly a balance is needed between meeting Vitamin D requirements and skin cancer protection. However, the appearance of sunburn is not an appropriate benchmark for excessive sun exposure. A number of sources point out that the mechanism for the initiation of skin cancer is thought to occur at lower doses than sunburn (i.e. sunburn is an indicator that damage has already occurred, not a signal to go in.)
Based on the rates of cancer versus rickets and the ability to obtain Vitamin D through supplements or food, it seems that while both are serious problems, skin cancer seems the more dangerous of the two. However, the current data suggest different populations are more at risk for certain types of diseases, and these should be taken in account by qualified medical providers when evaluating the needs of a specific individual.
Posted by: Matthew | July 31, 2006 5:36 PM
It has already been proved that sunlight is not harmful upto 2 hours after sunrise and 2 hours before sunset. Thus, common sense suggests that we use these window periods for getting our vital exposure. Unfortunately, the modern lifestyle (especially occupational work) does not permit such 'indulgences' every single day, which is sad, but fairly indicative of the progressive rot in modern society.
Posted by: yogi | August 5, 2006 8:23 AM