ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.

Read about our authors.


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square

    Relax, it's baby safety month

    Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls


    FEATURED

    Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health

    Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?

    Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children

    Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs



    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Harvard ethics investigation violates federal law | Main | In the news: October 30, 2006 »

    Industry challenges ban on phthalates in kid's toys

    By Matthew

    October 27, 2006

    phthalate_american_chemistry_council.jpgIndustry and trade groups are suing to overturn San Francisco’s newest ordinance aimed at protecting the city’s toddlers from a suite of chemicals shown to cause cancer and hormone disruption in laboratory trials. The ban prohibits the sale and manufacture of toys and products intended for children under the age of 3, if they contain phthalates—compounds used to soften plastics containing PVC and Bisphenol A.

    San Francisco’s phthalate ban is based on the city’s "precautionary principle,” a landmark policy requiring chemicals be proven safe before they reach market. In the U.S. the norm is for chemicals to reach market on the “innocent until proven guilty” presumption until it can be conclusively proven that they are causing measurable harm to a population.

    Straight to the source:
    San Francisco Chronicle

    « Harvard ethics investigation violates federal law |