ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
FEATURED
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« Religious groups in Canada declare war on bottled water | Main | In the news: Too much testosterone kills brain cells »
Farmer to AJC on Farm Subsidies: "We're playing a game."
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is running an investigative series that examines many aspects of farm subsidies.
U.S. subsidies for cotton and selected other crops, born in the Great Depression to protect against the occasional bad year, have become a multibillion-dollar entitlement. The program undermines free trade and props up big farmers at the expense of small growers both here and abroad.By guaranteeing growers a minimum price, subsidies encourage them to plant what Washington will pay for, not what would earn a profit on the free market.
"We're just playing a game," said Stephen Houston Sr., a Miller County cotton farmer. "[Market] prices don't have anything to do with what we're doing. We're just looking at the government payments."
It's called "farming the subsidy," and it has turned many farmers -- once symbols of self-reliance -- into government dependents.
Read more:
• How savvy growers can double, or triple, subsidy dollars
• How your tax dollars prop up big growers and squeeze the little guy
• Who gets cotton aid? Ted Turner, nuns in Illinois ...
Note: Registration required.
Comments
It is a shame that the AJC feels compelled to attack the American Farmer. Americans have the LUXURY of having the cheapest and most closely regulated food supply in the world. We are government regulated as to what can be used to grow our crops.
Taxpayers, also known as American consumers, have to be pay for this. Either pay now with government subsidies or pay later at the grocery store and clothing stores in higher prices. Which do you choose?
The "average" farmer, who wasn't interviewed, does not have a condo in Florida. He makes his living working 6 days a week, 12 hours a day, not counting the night hours during irrigation season. The majority of his government subsidies are returned to the economy in form of rent, supplies, diesel, equipment, labor.
There will always be abuse in any program, be it a government regulated one or a private industry one. Do not assume that the abuse is being done by all.
By the way, if government subsidies were taken away, the lines at the welfare office would grow ten fold. The entire Southwest Georgia economy is dependent on agriculture, from the peanut mills and cotton gins and local gorcery stores and auto parts stores, to the little old ladies who depend on the farm rent to supplement their meager Social Security checks.
"Don't talk about the American Farmer with your mouth full."
Posted by: Connie Dozier | October 4, 2006 1:46 PM
Hi Connie,
Gulp. It is a shame that we took away such different messages from the AJC article. We, at EWG, and I'm almost certain, those at AJC, agree with you that food and the farmers that produce food are important. We also agree with you that rural communities are an important part of American culture and identity. However, we hope you agree, that any farmer that breaks the rules, should be punished. Additionally, we hope you agree that any auditor pursuing farmers who break the rules, should not be obstructed from the pursuit of justice on behalf of all Americans.
Michelle Perez
Senior Analyst, EWG
Posted by: Michelle Perez | October 5, 2006 1:10 PM
First of all, I’m a fourth generation rancher. Diversified ranching/farming was my parents and grandparents main source of income. As a youngster, I remember my dad having to go beyond diversification by finding work outside of ranching just to get us through the dry times. Without going into detail, at 39 years of age I’m living proof of how uncapped subsidies, corporate agriculture, and current legislation keeps my operation smaller than small. I’m a school teacher and I run 140 head of range sheep as a sideline. Please do not refer to me as a hobby rancher because my sheep make me a much needed profit for my family. I am very experienced and much more capable than most stockmen, and I have a lot to offer the younger generation. However, it’s difficult for my generation and the younger folks to compete simply because todays legislation allows the advantage to go to large scale agriculture. My rural community has lost its identity and we are left with just a few operators and many phantom landowners. I've never signed up to receive a government subsidy
As far as American food being cheap, well, it’s not. It has cost me over $1000 in medical bills and treatments…and still counting. My good looking teenage son has cystic acne. Cystic acne is severe and painful. Doctors will tell you that the reason for the severity of acne is genetic. Well, neither his mother nor myself had an acne problem at all during our pubescent years. Since my son is not genetically predisposed, then the reason must be environmental. I blame the added hormones in American dairy, poultry, and meat. Hormonal disruption is the physical cause of acne.
I pray every day now that my 11 year old daughter will not wake up tomorrow with an adult woman’s chest and a man’s waist. Please take a look at the youngsters around you and you’ll see that my son is not the only one suffering, and also please do not be blind to the young girls’ imbalances.
Posted by: donny allen | October 12, 2006 4:15 PM