ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« It's dust to dust in "treehugger hippy heaven" | Main | American Dental Association concedes: Excessive fluoride a risk to children »
French proposal to tax non-Kyoto supporters
As the climate change talks in Nairobi stagger forward, the French have thrown a new proposal into an already sludgy mix. Instead of allowing the world’s worst polluters, the United States and China, to ignore the problems, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has proposed taxes on imports from countries that have not signed the Kyoto Protocol.
De Villepin suggests that European countries stand up with France to tax coal usage, industrial pollution and aircraft noise pollution by 10 percent. The International Energy Agency’s press release yesterday attributes 60% of the CO2 growth of over 1.2 billion tones between 2003 and 2004 to an increase in coal use. A tax like the one proposed by De Villepin targets not only countries that need to be a part of Kyoto to make it worthwhile, but also targets a major part of the climate change problem.
This “carbon war” seems like a great response to the environmental dumping of developed countries. Will the WTO allow this economically forward and environmentally friendly proposal? We only need to remember the “tuna-dolphin” dispute of the US vs. Mexico, as well as many other examples, to see that such a forward thinking amendment may not be plausible. Watch and see if this hit-‘em-where-it-hurts approach creates a significant response within the next few days from the other delegations in Nairobi.
I'm not sure that it's implied by Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, but the way I read this article, there might be a Carrot part of the approach. I'm a fan of bunnies, even from studios who have copyright issues, and so prefer carrots to sticks.
Bottom-line, might it be an interesting and perhaps politically useful twist to add in that those CITIES whose mayors who have signed Kyoto would not be impacted by the tax, or perhaps would be taxed at a lower rate?