ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls
FEATURED
Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health
Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?
Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« It's dust to dust in "treehugger hippy heaven" | Main | American Dental Association concedes: Excessive fluoride a risk to children »
French proposal to tax non-Kyoto supporters
As the climate change talks in Nairobi stagger forward, the French have thrown a new proposal into an already sludgy mix. Instead of allowing the world’s worst polluters, the United States and China, to ignore the problems, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has proposed taxes on imports from countries that have not signed the Kyoto Protocol.
De Villepin suggests that European countries stand up with France to tax coal usage, industrial pollution and aircraft noise pollution by 10 percent. The International Energy Agency’s press release yesterday attributes 60% of the CO2 growth of over 1.2 billion tones between 2003 and 2004 to an increase in coal use. A tax like the one proposed by De Villepin targets not only countries that need to be a part of Kyoto to make it worthwhile, but also targets a major part of the climate change problem.
This “carbon war” seems like a great response to the environmental dumping of developed countries. Will the WTO allow this economically forward and environmentally friendly proposal? We only need to remember the “tuna-dolphin” dispute of the US vs. Mexico, as well as many other examples, to see that such a forward thinking amendment may not be plausible. Watch and see if this hit-‘em-where-it-hurts approach creates a significant response within the next few days from the other delegations in Nairobi.
Comments
I'm not sure that it's implied by Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, but the way I read this article, there might be a Carrot part of the approach. I'm a fan of bunnies, even from studios who have copyright issues, and so prefer carrots to sticks.
Bottom-line, might it be an interesting and perhaps politically useful twist to add in that those CITIES whose mayors who have signed Kyoto would not be impacted by the tax, or perhaps would be taxed at a lower rate?
Posted by: lowellbellew | November 27, 2006 5:23 AM