ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« OSHA tries to put the brakes on asbestos precautions | Main | Organic farmed fish a contradiction in terms »
Senior ex-official speaks on FDA's failure to get benzene out of soft drinks
In 1991 the FDA let the beverage industry decide what to do about benzene in its soft drinks, without offering any guidelines for eliminating the carcinogen. Fifteen years later, benzene was still forming in soft drinks containing the ingredients sodium benzoate and ascorbic acid.
In an article for Food Navigator, Chris Mercer interviews a former FDA enforcement official about the agency's permissive attitude toward carcinogens in soft drinks. Acknowledging he was “not proud” of the FDA’s inaction on benzene, the ex-official noted:
Big companies are very powerful. If you’re a regulator with a tight budget, it could have been one of those closets with skeletons in it that you don’t want to open.
But while industry may once have benefited from (or demanded) FDA’s hands-off regulatory style, a slew of lawsuits this year has some soft drink manufacturers—most notably Kraft Foods--requesting more guidance. According to Effect Measure, FDA just can’t win:
Now [FDA] are in danger of getting on the wrong side of the food industry, too, as the food industry entreats the FDA to give them guidance. The FDA can't even do its corruption competently.While the FDA and industry both trivialize the risks of cancer from benzene in soda, Effect Measure points out:
The problem is that with tends of billions of bottles consumed around the world, the risk doesn't have to be large. A one in a million risk is nothing for an individual but it is 1000 cancers for a billion individuals.The ex-FDA official adds perspective as well.:
There is a difference here between a small and unavoidable risk, and a small but avoidable risk, the source said.The FDA seems to think the risk is quite low here. On the other hand, it's in a [non-essential] product nobody needs, and it doesn’t have to be there. They claim they can reformulate.
AMEN, Kraft. Nothing like having big business suing the goverment for MORE regulation to show how incompetent the federal government has become the last 6 years. Guess business is realizing that even with under-the-table encouragement by the feds to cut corners at the consumers' expense doesn't ultimately benefit the bottom lie, when such consumers' sue for dangerous and defective product.
Amen to all the citizens enforcing the job that the FDA should've be doing all along.
Hope this is embarassing wake up call to the FDA and exploitive businesses encourages a system where the health and safety is valued over a short-lived dollar gain.