ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Experimental Xerox paper erases itself | Main | Autism bill passed in Congress »

MPG estimates get more realistic in 2008

December 12, 2006

inside2-fuel-economy-sticker.jpgEPA's new system for measuring fuel efficiency should bring cars’ advertised MPG closer to their actual gas mileage. At present, fuel efficiency testing is not done under real world driving conditions, so the sticker numbers represent inflated fuel mileage.

Interestingly, hybrids will probably see the largest decline in their MPG sticker numbers, as the new tests, slated to roll out in 2008, incorporate more cold-weather driving and quick acceleration—neither of which make efficient use of a hybrid’s electric capabilities.


Toyota, manufacturer of the top-selling Prius, is in favor of the new rating system:

"This is all about providing more and better information to consumers. [It] doesn't change the car or the technology, just the way the mileage is calculated," said Ming-Jou Chen, spokeswoman for Toyota Motor Sales USA. "It makes the estimate closer to real-world numbers, and we fully support that."
The 2008 tests will include, for the first time, medium-duty trucks and large SUVs, previously exempt from testing because of their “commercial” status. Perhaps consumers, finally provided with more accurate mileage estimates, will be discouraged from buying behemoths with insultingly low gas mileage.

Vehicle mileage estimates get real. LA Times. 12 Dec 06
Real MPG: An Environmental Working Group report on corporate MPG requirements. July 06

« Experimental Xerox paper erases itself |