ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls
FEATURED
Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health
Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?
Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« Liveblogging the farm bill teach-in | Main | Outdated cosmetics can cause bacterial infections »
Katrina IMAX feature glosses over reality
I left the Smithsonian's IMAX Theater after seeing Hurricane on the Bayou wondering how the film's producers managed to make such a colorfully feel-good movie about the devastation of Katrina. The Washington Post's Philip Kennicott apparently had the same questions and went digging. Read what Philip found.
For those in a hurry, here's the gross oversimplification:
1. The film was partially funded by Chevron, Dow Chemical Co., and Dominion Exploration and Production, as well as a nonprofit group known for working to ease wetland regulations.
2. The nature of the IMAX lends itself better to beautiful hyper-realistic imagery and entertainment than education.
Rose-Colored Lens, by Philip Kennicott. Washington Post (22 Mar 07)
Comments
As a resident of New Orleans I wasn anxios to see the movie when it was first released down here on the anniversary of Katrina. I also found that it could have given more info, but its an IMAX film and they are all geared to tourist. The point was to raise awareness about the issue of coastal restoration, and it did that.
As far as the sponsors for the movie remeber it was filmed in Louisiana and most of large companies tend to be in the oil industry.
Everyone wants to put the blame on them for the destruction of the wetlands and they are indeed responsible for a good bit of it, but the real destruction has occured because since the US bought Louisiana it has decided that it needs to control the river for commerce. The river levees have prevented the river from flooding its banks, and therefore there has been no silt to replenish what is slowly sinking by nature.
It is time for American to wake up and realize that we have a major problem down here and that a large portion of the nations oil supply passes through this region. This is not an issue that will only effect louisiana, it will effect the entire country.
Everyone needs to put global warming asside and put their attention down here. we have our plans for recovery, we just need the money to make it happen.
Posted by: Matthew Mims | March 22, 2007 8:19 PM