ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.

Read about our authors.


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square

    Relax, it's baby safety month

    Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls


    FEATURED

    Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health

    Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?

    Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children

    Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs



    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « UCBP: Update | Main | Quick picks from today's NY Times »

    Perverse ethanol incentives breed more gas-guzzlers

    By Trina

    March 28, 2007

    bushbig3.jpgPresident Bush and other ethanol proponents claim that pushing alternative fuels will reduce U.S. gasoline consumption. By developing a fleet of flexible-fuel vehicles that can burn E85—a fuel that consists of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline—some say that the United States will be able to replace many of its gasoline imports with domestic fuel production.

    But the Alternative Motor Fuels Act established in 1988 may negate these perceived benefits by allowing lower mile-per-gallon standards for E85 compatible vehicles. Since it is often cheaper to produce flexible-fuel vehicles than to produce fuel-efficient ones, American automakers have eagerly jumped onto the ethanol bandwagon. According to BusinessWeek, a larger proportion of gas-guzzling “alternative” vehicles could result in more gasoline consumption, not less.

    A lack of E85 filling stations only adds to the problem. If consumers only have gasoline to choose from, it does not matter whether or not their cars can burn ethanol. Less than one percent of U.S. gas stations currently sell E85.

    « UCBP: Update |