ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

GAO Flunks Some States on Tap Water Quality Monitoring

GAO Knocks EPA Tap Water Monitoring

Reusing Your Gray Water: State Laws Vary for Homeowners

GAO to EPA: Improve Implementation of Safe Drinking Water Act

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Toxins in our Kids' Foods: Where is the FDA?

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Fluoride in Your Water: How much is too much?

Borax: Not the Green Alternative It's Cracked Up to Be

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Healthy Home Tips

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Arsenic and old lies in Baltimore | Main | Two days left to Grow Organics! »

What's not for dinner? Great Lakes fish.

July 12, 2007

trout.jpg
So much for "gone fishing".

A report by the Canadian watchdog Environmental Defence has revealed that many types of Great Lakes fish are "somewhat or completely unfit for human consumption". And, the organization warns, fish advisories will increase as more categories of fish are found to be dangerously contaminated.

The report, Up to the Gills, examines fish advisories issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. While the organization is quick to point out that fish is a healthy source of nutrients for humans, they (rightly, I think) want to draw attention to the fact that pollution regulations on the Great Lakes are too lenient:
"[...] toxic contamination levels suggest that we are still treating the Great Lakes as a toxic waste dump,” said Aaron Freeman, Policy Director of Environmental Defence. “We are clearly not doing enough to protect this vital ecosystem. We need stronger pollution regulations and a real plan from the federal and provincial governments to clean up the Lakes.”

The organization also points out that all fish is subject to some contamination. The biggest toxic concerns for the Great Lakes include mercury, PCBs, pesticides, dioxins and furans, many of which are also a problem for ocean and farmed fish. The report makes several recommendations, including -- wait for it -- reducing pollution!

A little fuzzy on fish consumption? EWG's tuna calculator will help you figure out how much canned tuna you can safely eat a week, and seafoodwatch.org has a guide to what fish to buy (and why).

« Arsenic and old lies in Baltimore |