ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
GAO Flunks Some States on Tap Water Quality Monitoring
GAO Knocks EPA Tap Water Monitoring
Reusing Your Gray Water: State Laws Vary for Homeowners
GAO to EPA: Improve Implementation of Safe Drinking Water Act
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Toxins in our Kids' Foods: Where is the FDA?
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Fluoride in Your Water: How much is too much?
Borax: Not the Green Alternative It's Cracked Up to Be
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Saturday Morning Multimedia: Toilet environmentalism | Main | Outside the Box: Going for gold »
Big-box muscles push for greener packaging
When a retailer with $60 billion in annual sales says jump, manufacturers ask how high, and in this case that's great news for the environment.
An initiative by Target to persuade its private-label packaging companies to eliminate excess packaging has resulted in more sensible packaging for more than 500 products so far, and Director of Packaging John Butcher implies that we can expect the process to continue. Wal-Mart has instituted a similar program, vowing to eliminate all private-label PVC packaging by 2009.
PVC (polyvinyl chloride) is of particular importance to us here at Enviroblog, since the perennial plastic packaging favorite contains vinyl chloride (classified by the EPA as a human carcinogen) and phthalates (which are linked to hormone disruption). And, as Izzy points out,
"so much of that stuff we use comes ONLY in plastic, regardless of the brand. And while makers claim this plastic or that plastic is safe, I’ve heard that too many times only to find out later that it’s not safe at all."
Critics call it greenwashing, and certainly the move to minimize packaging makes good business sense for the retailers -- it will not only improve their image with environmentally-conscious consumers, but reduce shipping costs and increase shelf-space at retail outlets. But short of a massive consumer movement to eliminate excess packaging (which, unfortunately, still seems far-fetched), requests from big-box retailers are the most effective way to influence manufacturers.
So good for Target and Wal-Mart for using their considerable economic muscle for the greater good. Hopefully positive consumer response will make it profitable for them to move on to even bigger environmental initiatives.