ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Outside The Box: Head for the hills! | Main | Toxic children's toys signal time for reform »
EPA sued over potentially dangerous pesticide
When a CDC website describes the possible medical effect of a pesticide like this
...may produce a variety of effects on the nervous system including headaches, blurred vision, watering of the eyes (called lacrimation), excessive salivation, runny nose, dizziness, confusion, muscle weakness or tremors, nausea, diarrhea, and sudden changes in heart rate...
It seems sensible to think that maybe the government would move to ban it.
In the case of chlorpyrifos, the pesticide whose possible side effects are described above, a ban was enacted on the chemical's indoor use. But last summer, disregarding their own calls for further research into the effects of the pesticide, the EPA reauthorized its agricultural use.
Yesterday a coalition of farmworker advocates filed suit against the EPA. According to the suit, the EPA's continued allowance of chlorpyrifos constitutes a violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act.
Given that the EPA has acknowledged that chlorpyrifos can cause "paralysis and death" in high doses, I'd say the reauthorization also constitutes a glaring disregard for farmworker health and safety. Says attorney Shelley Davis, "With safer alternatives already in widespread use, the EPA has betrayed the trust of the men, women, and children whose health it is supposed to protect."
Incidentally, the Fairness Amendment to the House Agricultural Committee's version of the Farm Bill would have "required more complete reporting of pesticide use in agriculture," a move that was supported by many of those involved in the lawsuit.
Read more: Seattle Times, AP, Wired Science
Leave a comment