ABOUT

Enviroblog is a project of Environmental Working Group, covering public health, environmental policy, and better
consumer choices. (Meet our authors here.)

TIPS

Did we miss something? Email Amanda.

BLOGROLL

FEED

 Subscribe in a reader

KEEP IN TOUCH

Sign up below for EWG's bimonthly email updates.

"One of the largest human trials in history."

Another Katrina legacy: Arsenic coated playgrounds

Ask EWG: What can I do about fluoride in my water?

ARCHIVE

select month September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004

SEARCH

« WaPo ignores BPA in baby formula | Main | 5 things accomplished faster than sunscreen regulations »

August 23, 2007

FDA proposes sunscreen regulations

Twenty-eight years after they first pledged to implement safety standards for sunscreens, the FDA has proposed regulations that would (among other things) require manufacturers to label sunscreens based on their ability to protect consumers from UVA rays. From the LA Times story:

Under the FDA proposal, sunscreen lotions would be tested for UVA protection, as they are now tested for UVB. They would then be assigned one to four stars, with four representing the highest level of protection. Some tanning products provide no UVA protection, and the FDA is proposing such lotions bear a label indicating that they offer no safeguard against UVA rays.

The proposal would also make changes to the SPF ratings for protection against sunburn. Lotions providing up to SPF 50 -- or 50 times the skin's natural protection against sunburn -- would be recognized.

In addition, the FDA is calling for a new warning on all sunscreen lotions saying that exposure to the sun increases the risk of skin cancer, as well as other damage, including premature aging. The label will say that using sunscreen is only one way to protect against the sun, and others include wearing protective clothing, such as a hat or long-sleeved shirt, and staying out of the sun, particularly during the middle of the day.

You know, it's funny, I swear I read something about sunscreen safety earlier this summer. Do you think that may have had something to do with the FDA's decision? U.S. News and World Report seems to think so:

[The] label changes were partly spurred by a report from a Washington,
D.C.-based nonprofit, the Environmental Working Group, in June. The EWG
faulted the FDA for missing a deadline imposed by Congress to set sunscreen
safety standards by last year.

In a statement released following the FDA's announcement, EWG's VP for Research Jane Houlihan had this to say:

“The proposed sunscreen safety regulations by FDA are a positive step forward, but we’ve been here before and seen FDA cave in to industry objections. [...] FDA first pledged to implement federal safety sunscreen regulations over 28 years ago and to date nothing has been finalized. We hope this time FDA moves much faster so the public can have confidence in the claims that they see on sunscreen product labels.”

Looking for a safe, effective sunscreen for those last, long beach days? Check the sunscreen database.

« WaPo ignores BPA in baby formula |