ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

GAO Flunks Some States on Tap Water Quality Monitoring

GAO Knocks EPA Tap Water Monitoring

Reusing Your Gray Water: State Laws Vary for Homeowners

GAO to EPA: Improve Implementation of Safe Drinking Water Act

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Toxins in our Kids' Foods: Where is the FDA?

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Fluoride in Your Water: How much is too much?

Borax: Not the Green Alternative It's Cracked Up to Be

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Healthy Home Tips

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Big-box muscles push for greener packaging | Main | Beach closings at all-time high in 2006 »

Outside the Box: Going for gold

August 7, 2007

We are one summer away from the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, and the host country is trying to win the gold by going green. This week’s Outside the Box hurdles organic pork, strict air quality control standards, and vast urban renewal in a marathon of environmental stories that might leave you forgetting about lead paint and toxic food.

Hamming it up
thislittlepiggy.pngThe official Olympic pork supplier, Qianxihe Food Group, is changing the way it prepares its meat so athletes won’t fail their drug tests. Special pigs grown in a secure location (one step away from an undisclosed bunker) will be fed organically grown feed and not injected with growth hormone. This of course implies chemicals banned by the International Olympic Committee are regularly present in Qianxihe (Lucky Crane is the U.S. brand) meat at doses high enough to appear on drug tests.


More below the fold...

The significance of this seems to be clear to everyone but the Qianxihe spokesman. The chemical supplements, such as growth hormone injected into the pigs and even the chemicals in the food they eat, are eventually passed on to the human consumer and become unwanted body burdens—yet again more toxins in the concealed chemical soup we ingest everyday. These pigs are normally deemed fit for consumption but hey, the rest of us aren’t Olympic athletes, right? Maybe OTB should forward the organics petition EWG recently delivered to Congress to Qianxihe executives.

At least the company seems to be taking these particular pigs seriously. Check out this hilarious quote by a Qianxihe spokesman, “From the perspective of terrorism prevention, the pig farms are secret and cannot announce their names, conduct publicity or allow entry by strangers until after the Olympics.” Perspective anyone?

Mixed Reviews
rebuidlingBeijing.pngThe Chinese government is rebuilding Beijing. With the remodeling comes the good, the bad, and the ugly. The Chinese leadership has made conscious efforts for environmentally friendly, sustainable development including setting aside the tidy sum of twelve billion dollars for ‘green’ construction projects. These projects include adding hundreds of square miles of parks, greenbelts, and trees.

Their methods leave a lot to be desired, however. A balance between the community, environment, and the need for development should always be sought, and in China that hasn’t been the case. The Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that as many as 1.5 million people have been evicted for Beijing’s photo op. Many of these evictions have been unwilling, uncompensated, and even involved the use of force. In addition, many of the Chinese rural provinces are attempting to mimic Beijing’s grandiose development in much less environmentally friendly ways. The Chinese model of rapid at-all-costs development is a far cry away from ideal.

While China’s newly developed environmental conscious looks to be like a positive event, a plethora of contradictions exist beneath the surface. Hopefully, human rights will play a larger role in Beijing’s development and growth hormone free pigs become the norm, not the exception.

« Big-box muscles push for greener packaging |