ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« SMM: City Slickers | Main | 9/10/07: EnviroHealth News »
Canadian politicians find there’s no escaping BPA
You don’t need me to tell you that poor folks are more likely to find themselves dealing with illnesses induced by environmental toxins (although clearly if you give me half a chance I will). Most toxic chemicals – the kind that spill out of industrial factories and result from mining operations, for example – discriminate against the poor, whose homes (for a variety of reasons) are often nearby to such operations.
But bisphenol A (BPA) isn’t picky. If you drink water, breath air, eat food, or use many personal care products, you’ve got the hormone-disrupting chemical flowing through your blood. The was the lesson that three Canadian political leaders learned when Canada’s Environmental Defence tested their body burden levels. And it isn’t just BPA that’s making it’s way into elite bodies:
“A total of 46 pollutants, of the 70 tested for, were detected in the three volunteers, including bisphenol A, 8 phthalates, 13 PCBs, 10 organochlorine pesticides, 6 PAHs, 4 PFCs, and 4 organophosphate insecticide metabolites.”
The three politicians’ body burden was, on average, higher than that of the families studied for Environmental Defence’s Polluted Children, Toxic Nation report. The organization, whose campaigns range from protecting green space in Ontario to rescuing endangered fish from extinction in addition to their body burden work, is using their series of studies on pollution in people to encourage the implementation of a Pollution and Cancer Prevention Act, which would
- include any substance listed in the federal National Pollutant Release Inventory, and require companies currently releasing those chemicals to find safer solutions;
- ensure that products containing carcinogens, mutagens (materials that disrupt genetic codes) and reproductive toxins would be labeled; and,
- stipulate that funding be provided to support companies, workers, and citizens to reduce, and hopefully eliminate, the use and production of toxins.
Wondering about body burden studies in the U.S.? We’ve got just the thing.
Leave a comment