ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
FEATURED
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« EPA's diacetyl secret | Main | Mossville's dioxin-free dreams »
How cutting out certain food additives could curb ADHD (and cancer too)
A UK study published today in the Lancet reveals that certain food additives, including sodium benzoate and some colorings, likely play a role in the increasingly frequent diagnosis of ADHD in children. Researchers gave drink mixtures of additives to nearly three hundred children and, sure enough, they got rowdy. The chemicals affected some children more strongly than others, but effects were noted across the board, in the general population as well as in children with diagnosed ADHD.
The UK's Food Standards Agency is issuing revised recommendations for parents, advising that any who notice signs of hyperactivity in their children avoid those additives. Many are angry that the government didn't take it a step further and ban the chemicals -- after all, who has constant control over their children's diets these days? -- but the FSA has passed that responsibility on to the European Food Safety Authority. The article in the Guardian goes into more detail about the study and the government's response.
The guardian misses a couple of points, though. First of all:
Sodium benzoate+ascorbic acid+heat=BENZENE, a human carcinogen.
The FDA asked drink companies to fix that little problem way back in the early '90s, but many of them are just getting around to it now that they're being sued.
Also: this is a social justice issue. Junk food is bad for children, but when money's tight junk food is often the cheapest way to put calories in your kid's belly. Warning parents to avoid foods with certain additives is useless for those who can't afford anything else -- and, of course, for those who live in the food desserts created in certain metro areas. Many in the UK seem to believe that banning the additives is the answer, and it would force junk food manufacturers' hands, but in the end kids would still be eating junk food. The real answer is much simpler: increase access to fresh fruits and veggies. All signs point to that solution. Why is it so hard to accomplish?