ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« EPA's diacetyl secret | Main | Mossville's dioxin-free dreams »
How cutting out certain food additives could curb ADHD (and cancer too)
A UK study published today in the Lancet reveals that certain food additives, including sodium benzoate and some colorings, likely play a role in the increasingly frequent diagnosis of ADHD in children. Researchers gave drink mixtures of additives to nearly three hundred children and, sure enough, they got rowdy. The chemicals affected some children more strongly than others, but effects were noted across the board, in the general population as well as in children with diagnosed ADHD.
The UK's Food Standards Agency is issuing revised recommendations for parents, advising that any who notice signs of hyperactivity in their children avoid those additives. Many are angry that the government didn't take it a step further and ban the chemicals -- after all, who has constant control over their children's diets these days? -- but the FSA has passed that responsibility on to the European Food Safety Authority. The article in the Guardian goes into more detail about the study and the government's response.
The guardian misses a couple of points, though. First of all:
Sodium benzoate+ascorbic acid+heat=BENZENE, a human carcinogen.
The FDA asked drink companies to fix that little problem way back in the early '90s, but many of them are just getting around to it now that they're being sued.
Also: this is a social justice issue. Junk food is bad for children, but when money's tight junk food is often the cheapest way to put calories in your kid's belly. Warning parents to avoid foods with certain additives is useless for those who can't afford anything else -- and, of course, for those who live in the food desserts created in certain metro areas. Many in the UK seem to believe that banning the additives is the answer, and it would force junk food manufacturers' hands, but in the end kids would still be eating junk food. The real answer is much simpler: increase access to fresh fruits and veggies. All signs point to that solution. Why is it so hard to accomplish?
Leave a comment