ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« How cutting out certain food additives could curb ADHD (and cancer too) | Main | SMM: City Slickers »
Mossville's dioxin-free dreams
I wonder what health insurance costs are like in Mossville, Louisiana?
Sky high, I imagine. Residents of that community have three times as much dioxin in their bodies as the average U.S. population. Dioxins are the worst offenders when it comes to toxicity; these byproducts of chemical manufacture can cause cancer and harm to the reproductive system, and can be incredibly damaging to a developing fetus. The EPA assigns contaminants like dioxins a “maximum safe exposure level,” generally in parts per billion, but dioxin’s maximum safe level is set at zero – meaning no amount of exposure is safe. This stuff is just that dangerous.
The government has had its eye on Mossville since at least 1998, when the EPA and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR, a division of the CDC) began collecting data for an “Exposure Investigation.” But the EPA and ATSDR missed an important opportunity when they failed to investigate the source of residents’ dioxin exposure. Then again, maybe they just didn’t notice all the factories.
Mossville, you see, is surrounded on all sides by industrial facilities. There are 14 of them, and at least 6 of them regularly release dioxins into the air and water. The government’s Exposure Investigation never mentions these vinyl, chemical, and petrochemical production plants as possible sources of Mossville residents’ dioxin exposure. Now the Exposure Investigation data has been compiled and analyzed by Advocates for Environmental Human Rights, and they’re wondering why – with all this data in their pocket – the EPA and ATSDR have been sitting on their hands while the community is forced to deal with industrially produced health problems.
The government agencies involved, AEHR says, have ignored their duty:
“Allowing industrial facilities to release massive quantities of harmful chemicals, including dioxins, into the environment without regard to the long-term effects on human health and the environment completely contradicts the missions of both ATSDR and EPA.”
The organization’s recommendations for the government agencies [pdf] are about as straightforward as can be. They must make human health concerns a priority in their work, investigate contamination from dioxins and other toxins that persist in the environment and concentrate as they move up the food chain, and inform communities and test subjects of the results of their studies.
Sounds simple enough . . . so why haven’t the EPA and ATSDR been doing that all along?
Good question.
« How cutting out certain food additives could curb ADHD (and cancer too) |
Because they're weak and they know it.
The truth sucks.
Actually they have more power than they know, they just don't know how to use it (or aren't allowed to use it). EPA is always trying to push companies to do the right thing in private, which usually doesn't work (surprise!). They need to start talking facts to the media and say what they think. That would get things moving more often.
Also, being understaffed leads you to low ball risk a lot because you can't handle any more work.
In short, the EPA is in sad shape.