ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Toxic cosmetics in teenage girls
FEATURED
Elected officials MIA; Instead Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health
Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic?
Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« SMM: Well-oiled machine | Main | Envirohealth News: Crime, unleaded »
Organic: Better for the planet, better for your health
For years governments have made a point of saying that there's no nutritional benefit to organic foods. Now they may have to eat their words.
A European Union funded study of organic and non-organic fruits, vegetables and animal products found that organic fruits and veggies had up to 40% more cancer-fighting anti-oxidants, and milk from organically-reared cows had as much as 90% more anti-oxidants when compared to non-organic milk. The study was conducted by researchers on adjacent farms -- one using organic methods, the other going the conventional route -- to come as close as possible to ensuring identical environmental variables.
Let's review, shall we? Organic is better for our health, better for the environment, it can feed the world, and it's even tastier (at least according to some lab rats). So why does it remain the neglected child of the farm bill?