ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
FEATURED
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« Consumer safety legislation going to Senate | Main | Mining reform law passes House 244-166 »
Coal, power, and poison in South Carolina
Usually when we talk about toxicity, we talk in parts-per-billion (ppb). South Carolina fisherman Perry White's body contains 6.5 parts-per-million of mercury -- that, in case you weren't sure, is a lot.
It's the fish. Or rather, mercury-contaminated fish is the immediate cause. But the title of an article in today's Charleston Post and Courier belies the fact that the root cause of Perry White's high mercury load is buried much deeper in the South Carolina swamps. It's all about coal, power and poison.
When coal power goes out, mercury pollution goes up, and it's gotta come down somewhere:
Several years ago, for instance, on a university campus near Steubenville, Ohio, scientists set up equipment to catch tiny amounts of mercury that fall from the air. They chose Steubenville because it's within 125 miles of more than a dozen coal-fired power plants.Over time, scientists found that roughly 70 percent of the mercury falling in that area came from coal combustion near Steubenville.
A companion article, The Mercury Connection, gives a glimpse of the results:
- Of 41 people tested for The Post and Courier, 17 who eat freshwater fish from South Carolina rivers had hair samples with mercury levels higher than what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers safe. Twenty-four had samples higher than what's typically found nationally in people who frequently eat fish.
- Six who were tested had mercury levels that would put them in the top 1 percent of those measured in a recent nationwide study. Leading mercury scientists and doctors contacted by the newspaper urged those with the highest levels to consider medical attention.
Comments on both articles suggest that nuclear power is the answer since, as we all know, there are no health risks that go along with that. Seriously.
Comments
As Enviroblog readers continue to deal energy issues, be it mercury from coal or radiation from atomic plants, you might find it helpful learn what nuclear power is really like day-to-day, as it is far different than the portrayals (positive or negative) by politicians and the press. I've worked in the industry for over two decades and saw a need for a book that would provide some perspective - and hopefully be entertaining as well. The result is "Rad Decision", available at no cost to readers at http://RadDecison.blogspot.com. Stewart Brand, noted enviornmentalist and founder of The Whole Earth Catalog has said: "I'd like to see Rad Decision widely read."
Posted by: James Aach | November 1, 2007 3:55 PM
Thanks for the comment, James. I looked over your website and the comments you've received, and I'm looking forward to giving it a read.
Posted by: Amanda | November 1, 2007 4:14 PM