ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)
FEED
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Amanda.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross
House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging
Chemical injections in Colorado
FEATURED
BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure
Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys
BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
Is there eco-friendly jewelry?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« SMM: Holiday shopping edition | Main | In Neodesha, BP stands for Big Problems »
November 26, 2007
"Um, thanks, but I don't generally print my email. . ."
Last week the LA Times ran an article about a trend in which email senders add a tag line to their outgoing messages, encouraging the recipient to “consider the impact on the environment before printing this email.”
I’m all for considering the impact of our actions on the environment, and there’s nothing wrong with the occasional reminder. Sure, it may come off as a little smug, especially when the tag is appended to an unsolicited email from someone looking for a favor – but as far as I’m concerned, there’s a bigger problem with the “don’t print this email” trend.
Who the heck prints their emails?! Seriously. Are people getting long, involved emails that need to be printed and read away from the computer? Are many of your emails filled with critically important information that needs to be paper-filed? I’ll admit that I occasionally print longer articles that I don’t have time to read at work, or reference materials that will be more useful in a paper copy. But most of the emails I receive are only a few lines long. I read an email, and then I either respond, delete it, or save it for later. Whenever I see a tagline admonishing me not to print all I can think is why on earth would I?
Maybe I’m out of touch. Maybe the offices I’ve worked in have been too hip to do something silly like print emails on a regular basis. But I’m incredulous, and I’d wager a bet that the “don’t print” tagline has outlived its usefulness.
Time to move on. I propose a new tagline: Please remember to turn off your computer when you leave your office. I know a lot more people who leave their computers on than people who print their email.
Comments
I believe it is the older and less computer literate among us that print out emails. I know plenty of people in the baby-boom age range (55-65) that still print emails. Perhaps not every two liner, but long ones that require extensive reading.
I agree that it is silly, but they just prefer seeing the printed word rather than reading on a computer screen. Perhaps anachronistic..but in any event, yes you are right. A message at the bottom of email won't stop your average emailer printer from printing the email if reading it on the screen hurts their eyes or concentration.
Posted by: Simon | November 27, 2007 12:25 PM
I printed out this blogpost and put it on the company bulletin board.
Posted by: vaporlock | November 30, 2007 3:59 PM
Simon, I suspect you're right. My eyes get tired, too, by the end of the day, so I can understand that motivation -- I just rarely get emails worth printing, I guess!
Vaporlock- well now, how's that for irony?
Posted by: Amanda | November 30, 2007 4:07 PM