ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.
FEED
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
FEATURED
Please don't disrupt my endocrines!
Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square
Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« Decisions, decisions? |
Main
| Plantation workers v. Dole:
Whose victory was it? »
Monsanto thinks they've got you fooled
If you live in Pennsylvania, you should know that your state's Secretary of Agriculture thinks you're stupid.
Actually, he seems to think all consumers are stupid, but his reach only extends to those in his state. Unfortunately, Monsanto's money and influence extends a lot further.
If you buy dairy products, you may have noticed that some (or much, depending on where you live and shop) non-organic dairy is now labeled rBGH-free, or some variation thereof. The artificial growth hormone is used to increase the amount of milk a cow produces, but it's banned in Europe and Japan and many in this country question its safety.
Monsanto, producer of GM seeds and pesticides you probably want to avoid, also produces the growth hormone, and they've been lobbying hard to prevent rBGH-free labeling. There's no scientific proof, they say, of a difference in milk from cows treated with the hormone. They finally got a foothold in Pennsylvania, where as of January first, milk producers won't be able to tell consumers what isn't in their products.
What is the Ag Secretary's reasoning? There's no scientific proof (gee, where'd he get that line from?), and oh -- it's too confusing for consumers. Their poor little minds just don't understand the complexities of shooting cows up with hormones.
Monsanto thinks we're all dumb, too -- they think consumers won't notice that their megacorporation is lobbying to put the kibosh on a movement that's threatening their profits.
Comments
This will not stand a constitutional test. The state cannot tell me what I can SAY about my product if it is true.
This is a Freedom of Speech issue.
Posted by: helen8 | January 20, 2008 9:02 PM
helen8 is right, if corporations can be considered a personal entity and have freedom of speech rights for advertisment, then this law doesn't exist.
I would expect Monsanto's efforts to fail, albeit founded on yet another deceptive law.
Posted by: Muffy Jo | March 1, 2008 9:33 PM
I've opted out of the whole game here in PA, and I now buy raw local milk. It is WONDERFUL, and I'll never go back to homogenized and pasteurized products again. I've also stopped going to Whole Foods and now I go to a local natural food market. Buy local! Buy fresh! Buy in season!
Posted by: BethPA66 | March 6, 2008 2:11 PM
Good for you, Beth! One of my best friends recently started getting her dairy products from a local farm. They're not raw (we're in DC, and there's that rule about crossing state lines), but they're local and from cows not treated with growth hormones. They don't deliver near me, but I'm thinking of going in with her on an order to try it out.
Posted by: Amanda | March 6, 2008 3:33 PM