ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« SMM: Holiday shopping edition | Main | In Neodesha, BP stands for Big Problems »
"Um, thanks, but I don't generally print my email. . ."
Last week the LA Times ran an article about a trend in which email senders add a tag line to their outgoing messages, encouraging the recipient to “consider the impact on the environment before printing this email.”
I’m all for considering the impact of our actions on the environment, and there’s nothing wrong with the occasional reminder. Sure, it may come off as a little smug, especially when the tag is appended to an unsolicited email from someone looking for a favor – but as far as I’m concerned, there’s a bigger problem with the “don’t print this email” trend.
Who the heck prints their emails?! Seriously. Are people getting long, involved emails that need to be printed and read away from the computer? Are many of your emails filled with critically important information that needs to be paper-filed? I’ll admit that I occasionally print longer articles that I don’t have time to read at work, or reference materials that will be more useful in a paper copy. But most of the emails I receive are only a few lines long. I read an email, and then I either respond, delete it, or save it for later. Whenever I see a tagline admonishing me not to print all I can think is why on earth would I?
Maybe I’m out of touch. Maybe the offices I’ve worked in have been too hip to do something silly like print emails on a regular basis. But I’m incredulous, and I’d wager a bet that the “don’t print” tagline has outlived its usefulness.
Time to move on. I propose a new tagline: Please remember to turn off your computer when you leave your office. I know a lot more people who leave their computers on than people who print their email.
I believe it is the older and less computer literate among us that print out emails. I know plenty of people in the baby-boom age range (55-65) that still print emails. Perhaps not every two liner, but long ones that require extensive reading.
I agree that it is silly, but they just prefer seeing the printed word rather than reading on a computer screen. Perhaps anachronistic..but in any event, yes you are right. A message at the bottom of email won't stop your average emailer printer from printing the email if reading it on the screen hurts their eyes or concentration.
I printed out this blogpost and put it on the company bulletin board.
Simon, I suspect you're right. My eyes get tired, too, by the end of the day, so I can understand that motivation -- I just rarely get emails worth printing, I guess!
Vaporlock- well now, how's that for irony?