ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Amanda.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Graver danger from a common herbicide
Cheatsheet: Perfluorochemicals (PFCs)
FEATURED
BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure
Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys
BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
Is there eco-friendly jewelry?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH

« BPA in formula: This is not a call to panic. | Main | Must read: Avoiding World War III »
December 6, 2007
Ask EWG: What is "fragrance"?
Question: Is it true that the cosmetics industry can put any chemical into a product’s "fragrance" without showing it on the ingredients list? What do they put in there?
Answer: It's true. When you see "fragrance" on a personal care product's label, read it as "hidden chemicals." A major loophole in FDA's federal law lets manufacturers of products like shampoo, lotion, and body wash include nearly any ingredient in their products under the name "fragrance" without actually listing the chemical.
Companies that manufacture personal care products are required by law to list the ingredients they use, but fragrances and trade-secret formulas are exempt. An analysis of the chemical contents of products reveals that the innocuous-looking “fragrance” often contains chemicals linked to negative health effects. Phthalates, used to make fragrances last longer, are associated damage to the male reproductive system, and artificial musks accumulate in our bodies and can be found in breast milk. Some artificial musks are even linked to cancer. And if you've got asthma, watch out-- fragrance formulas are considered to be among the top 5 known allergens, and can trigger asthma attacks. The same kinds of chemicals are often used for fragrances in cleaning products, scented candles, and air fresheners.
To avoid those unpleasant side effects, choose fragrance-free products, but beware labels that say "unscented." It may only mean that the manufacturer has added yet another fragrance to mask the original odor. Check ingredient labels carefully, or search Skin Deep to find products that do not list "fragrance" as an ingredient.
The best solution is not to allow cosmetics companies to get through this loophole. They should be required to list all of their ingredients on the label where consumers can find out what they're buying. On top of that, cosmetics manufacturers regularly include ingredients with known or suspected links to cancer, reproductive toxicity and other negative health effects. The federal government must set safety standards for personal care products.
If you're concerned about the chemicals you use on your body every day, sign EWG's petition at cosmeticsdatabase.com and urge the FDA to make personal care products safe.
Got a question for our researchers? Send it in! We'll select one (or a few) for next month's edition of Ask EWG.
Want Ask EWG sent to your inbox? Sign up for our monthly bulletin.
Comments
The above article is fantastic - pointing directly to one of the biggest problems facing people today: distribution of harmful chemicals as the "norm" or proprietary content and the utter lack of concern shown by the government or the general public over essentially what should be considered as mass-poisoning.
I find it truly startling that we are worried about terrorists distributing harmful toxins or utilizing the internet to distribute their harmful messages, and yet show no concern over the abundance of air freshner, candle, or other types of propaganda put out by corporations who essentially don't care if their products are lethal and who distribute their toxins under the guise of everyday household necessity.
I have chemical sensitivities and it has been impossible to determine why some perfurmes/colognes/fragrances cause more severe reactions than others. If the labels were marked it would be easier to find out specifically what I'm reacting to and if the government took more control over these corporations and what they are and are not allowed to distribute among the general public, I might find that my health and that of others would improve exponentially.
Posted by: B. | December 6, 2007 2:50 PM
I would like to know if these fragrances (chemicals) are harmful becuase they enter the body thru the skin or thru the nose (or both)? I don't use anything frangranced, but good lord my co-workers do, and I hate smelling it. Is smelling it potentially dangerous or just applying it to the skin?
Posted by: eram | December 6, 2007 3:20 PM
Good question, eram.
If you're smelling it, you're being exposed to the volatile parts of the fragrance - those that come off the skin to give off a smell. You're exposures are lower than those of the person wearing the product, but you're still exposed. Fragrances commonly contain allergens, and some people become so sensitive to fragrance that they find they can't comfortably be in a room with people wearing allergens.
Posted by: Amanda | December 6, 2007 3:44 PM
I was thrilled to read this. Now, if I could just get my co-workers & management to understand this isn't a personal affront to them, it's a health issue, well I'd be thrilled. I'm one of 3 women in my department of 19 who all sit in one big open area. Out of 19 women, 15 wear perfume, scented body lotion, etc. and some so strong you can smell them when you get off the elevator and across the room. I've worked here 21 years & through my own research & then confirmed by an environmental illness specialist, I know that I have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. 7 years ago I addressed the group saying I finally figured out why myself & others were hacking like we had bronchitis all the time. We asked them nicely to simply tone it down, saying it wasn't that they smelled bad, it was the chemicals, well without going into the whole stranger than a soap opera story, they got offended, starting wearing more, reapplying it, spraying the carpeting to name just a few crazy reactions to asking them to tone it down. Two of us have been wearing masks w/carbon filters for about a year and a half now, to try to minimize the effects. I'm now researching a respirator to buy because the mask just isn't doing the job. The reactions have "spread" to exhaust fumes, plastics, newspaper, color magazines, laundry detergent. It's true when they say: if it happened to me, it could happen to you. Just because you're not affected now - that you simply think it smells bad, doesn't mean this can't/won't happen to you. No doubt in my mind, this will be the next smoking issue. This has changed our lives in so many ways, not to mention how costly it's been to maintain our health.
Posted by: Diane | December 6, 2007 4:30 PM
Ref. the comment on perfumes, etc. from fellow employees above by Diane on Dec. 6. I too have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and can assure you that your statement about what your co workers did after you asked them to "Tone it down" is grounds for a lawsuit. The precident has already been set. It is a fact that if some one has told another that they have adverse reactions to fragrances and have this proven by a physician, that if the person or persons that they request to refrain from using or limit the use of a fragrance gos out of their way to make it worse or spray more around in the air they can be sued for assault and battery. It has been done and damages awarded.
Sincerely: Dave W.
Posted by: Dave | December 6, 2007 7:47 PM
My mom has MCS and it's awful. Our own family members still use Tide and other scented products. People are ignorant and just don't understand the adverse effects of fragrances. It is appalling that your coworkers would treat you this way.
Posted by: Jackie | December 8, 2007 2:19 PM
I would love to know more about the lawsuits. I developed Chemical Sensitivity after construction in my new offices and begged for accommodation for FIVE years. it was promised and never supplied. A whiff of perfume could result in five day paralyzing migraines or blackouts. I finally had to leave my job. I filled an EEOC complaint and nothing has happened. All this so a few people could wear fragrances and impose their stink on everyone around them. Fragrance not only triggers asthma, but also allergies, migraines and Chemical sensitivity. It affects the neurological, respiraoty and reproductive systrems of HEALTHy people. Persoanl fragrance as well as chemical cleaning porducts and "air fresheners" (what a misnomer!) should be banned in the workplace and in public places as they are pollutants of air and water and damage everyone's health-- much as smoking does.
Posted by: Susan | December 8, 2007 4:41 PM
Would Multiple Chemical Sensitivities fall under the Americans with Disabilities Act? My sister has profound MCS, diagnosed and confirmed by doctors, and her workplace is required to be green in its use of cleaning agents, and any thing at all that she may be exposed to. This is a tall order, given she's an elementary art teacher in public schools. But the school district has complied with this. It's taken a lot of educating others on her part; hard work. However, after the hard work, it's begun to pay off. She's missed fewer days in recent years, by far, as compared to prior to the implementation of the protocols she needs. The thing is, think of all the hundreds of children who are benefiting from the school district that she's in implementing a green environment. Those children are so fortunate!
Posted by: Jenny | December 8, 2007 10:12 PM
I too, am sensitive to fragrances. I was visiting a (Catholic) church with a friend and, after suffering through some awful-smelling hair pomade from the person in front of me, I finally had to walk out when they began swinging the censor (fragranced smoke!) down the aisle. As I left, I could hear children beginning to cough.
I do have a concern with a general comment about "testing." Millions of animals are subjected to unimaginable torture in laboratories in "testing" that the researchers use to get financial grants for themselves and are usually not only absolutely unnecessary, but do not prove to be relevant to human beings - a completely different species! I could sign your petition if it was worded "non-animal testing."
I can't support the arrogance that believes we have some "right" to subject another species of God's creatures to deliberate torture. (Of course, apparently there are those who believe that "with adequate reason" we even have the right to subject other human beings to torture! All deliberate infliction of suffering is monstrous and sick - perpetrated by arrogant monsters who are missing something vital in their souls.).
Posted by: Ann Fennell | December 10, 2007 12:37 PM
I too had a similar experience as Diane. It eventually caused me to go into shock and subsequent hospitalization. Since then I have had several attacks, the last ended up in the coronary care unit. Still, my co-workers prefer their stink to my life. No evidence of health risk will overcome the ever so powerful advertisment machine and through them the chemical corporation.
A sad world we are living in.
Christel
Posted by: Christel | May 1, 2008 1:32 PM
About 3 months ago, I learned about the trouble w/ fragrances and other chemicals in my life from stumbling into webpages like this. Thank goodness! Now I've stopped poisoning myself--and have even learned about homemade, natural household products that work BETTER than the stuff I was purchasing all my life before. Anyway, I'm still trying to get the whole deodorant solution perfected and um.... since I've gone off antiperspants...my boss called me into her office to tell me I smelled and need to try clinical strength antipersperant and perfume. I hate to look like the dirty hippy in the office, but I feel that my odor is at least not poisonous like the odor of all the other women that put air fresheners, lotions, and heavy perfume all over and make me sneeze. Well, all I can do is put on some essential oil and hope no one complains again about me.
This problem is made worse by the fact that I have a hormone problem that makes me sweat more (and by the way, I've also learned since then that women w/my hormone problem are shown to have higher levels of BPA and phalates in their systems. Hmm...so I wonder what caused my problem to begin with?? Um...deodorant? Ironic, huh? Yeah, there's no way I'm putting on the antipersperant again--I just hate to offend others and look unprofessional, but what can I say? I'm not going to make my problem worse.
:(
Posted by: Pam | May 4, 2008 4:20 PM