ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« The once and future king? | Main | California may add BPA, caffeine to Prop. 65 »
Where government fails, the market steps in
It seems that investors are planning to use the power of the market to influence the production of plastics and the problems that go with it. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel is reporting that there have been a remarkable number of shareholder resolutions filed for publicly held companies for their use of potentially toxic chemicals. Seven have been filed for 2008 already.
Bart Mongoven, who knows about these things, says "The use of shareholder resolutions is, I think, the most effective way of making this an issue for the executives of the corporation." He's VP for public policy intelligence at a national consulting firm. I imagine (with my limited understanding of how these things work) that he's right, but I can't help but think: Shouldn't the government be making this an issue for company execs?
The federal government has been slow to put safeguards in place to ensure that chemicals used to make the products we use in our homes every day are, in fact, safe -- so now shareholders will force the issue for them. This is not a "Cheers and Jeers" column, but if it was. . . I think you know where my votes would go.
Leave a comment