ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« SMM: ZapRoot and Mixed Greens | Main | White House worked to weaken pollution reporting for communities »
A turning point for the Chesapeake Bay?
Last December, the Maryland legislature approved a new $50 million “Chesapeake Bay 2010 Trust Fund” to help clean up the decades-dirty Bay. The “2010 Trust Fund” will provide money to help move the state closer to achieving water quality goals set back in 2000 by the 2010 deadline. Everyone has accepted these goals will not be achieved in time, but public trust in the state’s ability to even make a dent is waning.
This year, state officials have a chance to strengthen public confidence that they are actually doing everything they can to clean up the Bay by announcing they will spend the Fund using a “cost-effectiveness” principle. Though seemingly simple and straightforward, this common sense approach to spending the public’s money is a radical departure from the past when funds were largely distributed on a first-come, first-share basis.
Among the various options for reducing the nutrient pollution ailing the Bay, agricultural best management practices deliver the biggest bang for the nutrient-reduction buck. That means Maryland’s farm conservation programs should get most (if not all) of the Fund. But in order to truly have an impact, Maryland’s farm conservation programs should spend the fund in the most cost-effective way they can. Maryland’s agriculture, environment, and natural resource agencies should commit to following a three-step approach:
- Identify and prioritize the highest nutrient loading watersheds,
- Identify and prioritize the highest nutrient loading farmland locations within the
priority watersheds,
- Identify and prioritize implementation of the most cost-effective and site-appropriate conservation practices.
Only by targeting the new funds to achieve the most nutrient reductions per dollar will the Chesapeake Bay have a chance to recover.
Leave a comment