ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Church of England: Cut down carbon footprint for Lent | Main | Grand Canyon threatened: Road trip, anyone? »
Congress investigates science-for-hire over BPA
"Manufacturing uncertainty." It's a common tactic for companies whose products have undergone scrutiny by the scientific community. Here in our nation's illustrious capital there's no shortage of science-for-hire firms, who make their money by producing dubious reports in defense of whatever industry is paying their bills this month. Even well-intentioned organizations, like the National Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition, are not immune to industry's money -- you may recall how, this fall, their board released an industry-supported statement advising women to eat more mercury-laden fish, despite the contrary position of every significant member-organization (including the FDA).
But with the recent flurry of news and reports around bisphenol A, one firm in particular is coming under scrutiny. The Congressional Energy and Commerce Committee has requested that the Weinberg Group produce records on their work around bisphenol A, that toxic plastics chemical found in polycarbonate water- and baby-bottles as well as the lining used in food cans. Evidence that the chemical has estrogenic effects is piling up, and committee chair Representative Dingell wants answers.
Why is the Weinberg Group suspect? Well, for starters, their findings on bisphenol A run contrary to what virtually every other respected scientific body has found. Then there's the group's history: In a 2003 letter to chemical manufacturer DuPont, the Weinberg Group offers to "harness, focus and involve the scientific and intellectual capital of our company with one goal in mind—creating the outcome our client desires.”
It's been a while since I've studied the scientific method, but I'm pretty sure you're supposed to form your conclusions after you've done the analysis.
Representative Dingell also recently sent letters to each of the major baby formula manufacturers, asking them to supply all of the information they have on their use of BPA-lined cans for distributing infant formula. Last fall, an EWG analysis estimated that at BPA levels found in ready-to-eat liquid formula, 1 of every 16 infants fed the formula would be exposed to the chemical at doses exceeding those that caused harm in laboratory studies.
Congress and scientists are sorting out what to do about BPA, but you can take steps to minimize your exposure in the meantime.
Photo: The Mask by benjieordonez.
Leave a comment