ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Chemical interactions put coral reefs in danger | Main | CPSC: Last person out the door, hit the lights »

EWG applauds CPSC's move toward safer furniture

February 5, 2008

cigarette_pbdes.jpgAfter a decade delay, CPSC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking last Friday that would set new fire retardant standards for home furniture. In a rare victory for public health the rules would require the fabric to be fire resistant instead of the foam inside.

Sound obscure? It is. Even some EWG researchers nod off when I talk about the details. But this bureaucratic move by a feeble government agency is actually a reminder of the obscure impacts that Big Tobacco and chemical companies have on your health.

Since 2002, EWG has documented the extent of contamination of fire retardants, known as PBDEs, in umbilical cord blood, mothers' milk, household dust and the environment. In January, CDC confirmed these findings with a study that detected PBDEs in the bodies of 99% of nearly 2000 Americans.

Somehow these obscure chemicals in couch cushions and carpet padding have found their way into all of us, and at levels that may impact babies' brain development. But the presence of toxic chemicals in furniture foam was neither accident nor oversight.

CPSC's vote ends a decade old stalemate between Big Tobacco, the handful of companies who make brominated fire retardants, and furniture-makers. As the Washington Post reported recently, this lengthy delay was largely the work of a single lobbyist, Peter Sparber, who was employed by both Big Tobacco and the bromine industry to fight restrictions on smoldering cigarettes, which are the primary source of furniture fires. Fire retardant fabric offers fire protection with significantly less chemical use, which isn't good for the bottom line if you are in the bromine business.

Individual states are now requiring that cigarettes be self-extinguishing, which dramatically reduces the risk of furniture fires. That alone is far more effective than loading our homes with toxic chemicals, including the one banned from children's pajamas in the 1970s.

In typical CPSC-style, this victory isn't complete. The regulations still allow the use of unknown and potentially toxic chemicals on foam, including Deca PBDE, HBCD, tris and other chemicals already shown to accumulate in people and the environment. EWG will be pushing for improvements to the final rule and keep you updated about the process.

But first we'll take a minute to savor this small victory.

Photo: Cigarette by SuperFantastic.

« Chemical interactions put coral reefs in danger |