ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.



TIPS

Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


BLOGROLL


STAY CONNECTED

Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


Farm Bill: 411 and Counting

Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A (BPA)

Mixed Greens 008: Big news for BPA


FEATURED

BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

Your BPA questions, answered



Ask EWG

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?


SEARCH


ARCHIVE

« Poor and uninsured. Sound familiar? | Main | Want PFCs with that? »

February 29, 2008

Just say no to downer cows?

ground beef recall

UPDATE: If you're interested in this subject, you've got to check out the Doreen the Downer cartoon.

Something that's been glossed over in many of the news articles and blog posts about the recent HSUS undercover investigation and the resulting massive ground beef recall is the fact that downer cows -- those that are unable to stand and walk -- are entering our food supply every day. As long as they're looked at and approved by a USDA veterinarian, there's no law against slaughtering downer cows for processing.

There could be a law -- Congress brought up just such a strategy in a hearing yesterday with Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer. The suggestion that downer cows should be banned from the food supply altogether (and that security cameras should be installed to ensure compliance) didn't go over well with Schafer, who points out that penalties against Westland-Hallmark have been "strong and swift."

Maybe they have been -- the company is certainly in dire straits at this point -- but the fact that it took the work of a non-profit to get anything done at all is downright embarrassing.

Shafer assures that it's okay. They're going to do more unannounced spot checks now. That ought to solve the problem, right?

« Poor and uninsured. Sound familiar? |