ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG TODAY

We need you to help protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

ENVIROBLOG TO YOU

 Enviroblog in your Reader

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act YouTube
Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page

Twitter

    Cell Phone Radiation Blog Series - All In One Place

    Rubber Ducky: You're so not the one

    Epigenetics hits the mainstream

    Cosmetics Safety Series - Part 2: Mind the (data) gap

    SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

    FIND PAST POSTS

    FEATURED

    Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

    Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

    So what products CAN we use?

    Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

    EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

    EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

    Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

    EWG on TV

    Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

    Toxic Tub?

    Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

    Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

    BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?

    Ask EWG Archives

    Top Blog Award

    Top  blogs award

    PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

    Breast Cancer Fund

    The Daily Green

    Eco Child's Play

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Green Moms Carnival

    Grist

    Healthy Child, Healthy World

    Huffington Post Green

    NRDC's Switchboard

    Organic.org

    Safer States

    TreeHugger

    TALK TO US

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

    « The science has spoken –- will policy makers listen? | Main | Chemical interactions put coral reefs in danger »

    Unilever takes a bite out of your face cream

    By Jane Houlihan

    February 4, 2008

    tiger_shark.jpgIf you follow our work on cosmetics, you know that companies have free reign over what they put in your products. FDA can’t require companies to test products for safety before (or after) they’re sold, and unlike for food additives and drugs, FDA doesn’t review or approve cosmetics before you buy them. Companies are the deciders when it comes to what’s safe enough to sell.

    Cosmetic companies may not have to test, but they do have to list ingredients on product labels, and on at least 126 products you’ll find the ingredient “squalene” listed in tiny print. It’s an oil used to soften skin and hair.

    Turns out that squalene can either be squeezed out of the livers of deep-sea sharks, or made naturally from rice or wheat. Seems an obvious choice for cosmetic formulators. But guess what Unilever picked.

    Thanks to pressure from our friends at Oceana, Unilever announced this week that it would switch from sharks to plants to make the squalene it adds to Pond’s, Dove, and other Unilever brands. This is great news and an important action, given that shark populations are plummeting worldwide from overfishing.

    But what remains disturbing is the fact that, either way, Unilever’s choices are in full compliance with federal cosmetic standards, which allow companies to use ingredients synthesized from, well, anything really -- including animal species collapsing globally in numbers, or petroleum products, or mining industry products --with no requirement that health or the environment be considered.

    Our research shows that companies even use ingredients that are known human carcinogens (like coal tar) and chemicals that can harm brain development (like mercury). Not to mention the nearly 90% of cosmetic ingredients that have never been assessed for health or environmental impacts, by the cosmetic industry’s safety panel, the FDA, or any other publicly accountable institution.

    Unilever’s action, spurred by public pressure, is taking a big bite out of your face cream. But it’s a nibble when you consider the more than 7,000 other cosmetic ingredients in face cream, sunscreen, deodorant, toothpaste, baby products, and more that still need the same kind of scrutiny.

    Photo: Tiger Shark by Willy Volk.

    « The science has spoken –- will policy makers listen? |