ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG TODAY
We need you to help protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
Get EWG widgets & blog badges.
ENVIROBLOG TO YOU
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
You could (almost) eat this furniture
Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?
Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox
Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Infant formula: How to choose it & use it
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« The science has spoken –- will policy makers listen? | Main | Chemical interactions put coral reefs in danger »
Unilever takes a bite out of your face cream
If you follow our work on cosmetics, you know that companies have free reign over what they put in your products. FDA can’t require companies to test products for safety before (or after) they’re sold, and unlike for food additives and drugs, FDA doesn’t review or approve cosmetics before you buy them. Companies are the deciders when it comes to what’s safe enough to sell.
Cosmetic companies may not have to test, but they do have to list ingredients on product labels, and on at least 126 products you’ll find the ingredient “squalene” listed in tiny print. It’s an oil used to soften skin and hair.
Turns out that squalene can either be squeezed out of the livers of deep-sea sharks, or made naturally from rice or wheat. Seems an obvious choice for cosmetic formulators. But guess what Unilever picked.
Thanks to pressure from our friends at Oceana, Unilever announced this week that it would switch from sharks to plants to make the squalene it adds to Pond’s, Dove, and other Unilever brands. This is great news and an important action, given that shark populations are plummeting worldwide from overfishing.
But what remains disturbing is the fact that, either way, Unilever’s choices are in full compliance with federal cosmetic standards, which allow companies to use ingredients synthesized from, well, anything really -- including animal species collapsing globally in numbers, or petroleum products, or mining industry products --with no requirement that health or the environment be considered.
Our research shows that companies even use ingredients that are known human carcinogens (like coal tar) and chemicals that can harm brain development (like mercury). Not to mention the nearly 90% of cosmetic ingredients that have never been assessed for health or environmental impacts, by the cosmetic industry’s safety panel, the FDA, or any other publicly accountable institution.
Unilever’s action, spurred by public pressure, is taking a big bite out of your face cream. But it’s a nibble when you consider the more than 7,000 other cosmetic ingredients in face cream, sunscreen, deodorant, toothpaste, baby products, and more that still need the same kind of scrutiny.
Photo: Tiger Shark by Willy Volk.
this is good news, but it's still is very upsetting that cosmetic companies don't care about what happens to their customers or the fact that the FDA has terrible regulations. it really is all about the money :(
How can a living being take a life from something else that is a living and breathing?
Where does that thinking come from?...It's just WRONG......
I think it wise on the part of the industry that they begin to recognize that we - the consumers - are starting to become educated in matters pertaining to health and well-being. And, that to continue to be productive amidst this significant change; they will find it necessary to follow the consumer.
i did not know any of this. it makes me sick to think i spent money to help them do such a thing.shows they onley have money it there hart, not love or caring.
its called population control there are so many carcinogens in our food, cosmetics, clothing, furniture, shoes.
We are the biggest science project on the earth.
Squalene is also in OLIVE OIL and that's even easier to come by, furthermore, as far as I know, it's not a GMO food. And you can buy it today and use it.
Congratulations to Unilever!
As we all become aware of "the right thing to do" responsible companies will follow. I appreciate the approach they're taken with the DOVE campaign on real beauty as well. It gives me hope for the future!
Call me clueless but I never knew there was a shark dervived bi-product in Dove. I adore Dove products. When will they make the change or have they started already? I ask so I'll know whether to toss out the current Dove I have (bought Christmas) or not....
It's all about the $$$$$$$. No company "cares" to do the right thing unless it has the ability to make them money.
Can someone answer this question? With all the thousands of animals suffering and dying every year in the name of cosmetic testing, why is it that over 7000 chemicals haven't even been verified as safe? It makes me sick to think of all those animals dying for nothing. What are they testing then?
As a few comments already mentioned, it is about the money - money for all the employees of the company, of course, but also for the company's shareholders. Who are the shareholders of all these corporations? Millions of American consumers. I, for one, don't know exactly where my 401(k) is invested. I think our responsibility as citizens and consumers is to not only buy products from companies that are using good, healthy practices, but also making sure that we aren't encouraging the problem by unknowingly investing in companies that continue to use unsafe and unhealthy practices.
Hithere, wanted to comment on your write up on squalene-we use a base of pure E>V>olive oil and find this active product is in the Olive Oil too-we talk alot to clients about its fabulous properties! BUt I am always amazed at how corporate business is always taking the easy road-when all the sharks are 'fished out' then they will have to look at what the vegetable world has to offer! What a cheek these guys have!!! Still most of the world loves to moan-but does nothing about it really! It will change in time! Sadly a few years down the road and we will not have sharks and whales to steal from! Good luck and thanks for your excellent articles.
It would be good to remember that you vote for these companies with your dollars. If you don't like what they're doing, don't give them your business. I suggest we all stop wanting someone else to take responsibility for our actions. Cocoa butter or coconut oil make great face creams. Do we really need products with lists of ingredients we can't even pronounce.
thanks to the environmental working group for making us all aware of the issues pertaining to our environment. This is a very malicious act of extracting the ingredients for our beauty products from already endangered sharks. It is a moment of disquiet for all of us that the cosmetic industry is enjoying the free ride towards human health and environmental degradation.
It is wonderful that many consumers are becoming aware of what's in their products. We need to keep pushing companies that we buy from to step up to the plate. There are companies out there (Arbonne International, Jason, Tom's, and others) who are concious about what they put in their products. We need to take responsibility for our own health and stop relying on the government with it's highly corrupt FDA to lead us around by the nose. This is Capitalism, not Socialism, after all...
I was unaware that squalene was being extracted from the liver of sharks.
I am an avid user of squalene oil (compressed from olive oil)and get it from a company in Maine called The Dirty Moose.
With so many plant sources available, I'm surprised that companies still rely upon animal fats and by-products to create products for use on the largest organ...our skin. We need to take a pro-active approach to investigate not only the ingredients in the foods we consume, but also in the products we use to clean our clothes, our homes and our bodies.
The FDA may not have set guidelines for companies to adhere to; but we certainly can make a difference. We need to challenge the status-quo by writing to the companies whose products we use to let them know what we will and will not tolerate in terms of their listing of ingredients. If enough of us take a stand, then companies will be forced to make consumer-required changes that will not only benefit our environment, but will also help their business remain profitable.
Nothing is said about what happened to the rest of the shark. Were they killing these animals just for the oil and then disposing of the rest of the animal...or where they using every part of this animal for human consumption?
I don't want to start a fight. I think all of these replies are very good. However, there was a reply about killing things that breath... I just wanted to point out anything living breathes. Including plants. So what should humans do to eat? Is this person a vegitarian, because even God says we can eat meat. I just eat organic. I use organic soaps, and foods. This way I don't have to worry about what's in this stuff.
unilever makes me sick they're endangering the tigers with their stupid soapstone mining.