ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Lead: Still in 35 percent of children's products | Main | Dangerous industrial chemical or drinking water additive? »
Contaminated fake fish show danger for real ones
Specially designed pseudo-fish constructed by U.S. Geological Survey scientists and suspended in the Potomac absorb chemicals including pesticides, herbicides, and artificial fragrances that contaminate the river, according to a recent Washington Post article.
The simulated fish consisted of a plastic-coated tube representing a fish’s permeable skin, enclosing a layer of fake fat. Chemical contaminants concentrated in this fat -– and scientists are concerned that these contaminants could cause disruption in the hormone systems of (real) fish.
Could eating fish contaminated with hormone-disrupting chemicals affect our health? According to the article, "Scientists said there was no evidence of a threat to human health." No one knows for sure, but a study presented at last year’s conference for the American Association for Cancer Research suggests cause for concern. In this study, researchers exposed breast cancer cells to extracts from fish caught in rivers near Pittsburgh. Some of the fish extracts triggered significant growth of these estrogen-sensitive cancer cells. The researchers concluded that people in Pittsburgh at risk for breast cancer may want to “avoid eating locally caught fish.”
The Potomac and Pittsburgh's rivers are not unusual - these days, you'll find traces of the same sorts of pesticides and industrial chemicals in any major river in America. That these chemicals end up in the fish we eat, and sometimes even in the water we drink, seems a recipe for disaster.
Photo: Fishing in the Potomac by sosico.
Leave a comment