ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)
FEED

An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.
TIPS
Did we miss something? Email Amanda.
BLOGROLL
STAY CONNECTED
Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]
Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross
House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging
Chemical injections in Colorado
FEATURED
BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure
Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys
BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic
7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs
Ask EWG
Is there eco-friendly jewelry?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
SEARCH
« What's not for dinner? Wild salmon | Main | Enviroblogroll, updated! »
March 18, 2008
Earthworms in the coal mine
Ah, the lowly earthworm. As the animal kingdom goes, it doesn't get more humble -- and as far as agriculture goes, it hardly gets more important. Without earthworms to plow up the undersoil and leave important nutrients behind them, our farms and gardens would be sad little places.
But a recent study by Environmental Science and Technology demonstrates that earthworms may also be the proverbial canary in the coal mine. You've heard of sludge fertilizers, right? That's where they take human "biosolids" from waste treatment plants, repackage them, and sell them as fertilizers. Along with human waste (which by itself would certainly be a valuable fertilizer), farmers and gardeners are treating their fields with a host of other household and personal care products. And the earthworms are soaking it up.
Not only are they absorbing the chemicals in the fertilizer (triclosan and synthetic fragrance chemicals, for example), but they're bioaccumulating them. That means the chemicals are getting stored in the worms' bodies, and it's adding up. In fact, for some chemicals, concentrations were an order of magnitude higher in the worms than in the soil.
This has a whole host of implications. What happens to animals that eat these worms? And to animals who eat those birds? For that matter, what happens to animals (including us) that eat plants grown in that soil?
Organic agriculture doesn't allow for the use of sludge fertilizers -- but even if you eat an all-organic diet, don't think that means you don't have to care. Runoff from sludge-fertilized non-organic farms easily contaminates organic fields. Even a ban on sludge fertilizers (which, for the record, isn't even being considered right now) would be a band-aid treatment. The only way to fix these problems is at the chemical and governmental levels, with toxic chemical reform legislation.