ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund. (More. . .)


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


TWITTER UPDATES

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Amanda.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Confirmed: New shower curtain smell is gross

    House bill would ban BPA in food, beverage packaging

    Chemical injections in Colorado


    FEATURED

    BPA in your body: How to minimize your exposure

    Caution: These 7 household items may feminize baby boys

    BPA in infant formula: This is not a call to panic

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs

    Your BPA questions, answered



    Ask EWG

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Is there eco-friendly jewelry?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Lead: Still in 35 percent of children's products | Main | Dangerous industrial chemical or drinking water additive? »

    March 21, 2008

    Contaminated fake fish show danger for real ones

    fishing_potomac.jpgSpecially designed pseudo-fish constructed by U.S. Geological Survey scientists and suspended in the Potomac absorb chemicals including pesticides, herbicides, and artificial fragrances that contaminate the river, according to a recent Washington Post article.

    The simulated fish consisted of a plastic-coated tube representing a fish’s permeable skin, enclosing a layer of fake fat. Chemical contaminants concentrated in this fat -– and scientists are concerned that these contaminants could cause disruption in the hormone systems of (real) fish.

    Could eating fish contaminated with hormone-disrupting chemicals affect our health? According to the article, "Scientists said there was no evidence of a threat to human health." No one knows for sure, but a study presented at last year’s conference for the American Association for Cancer Research suggests cause for concern. In this study, researchers exposed breast cancer cells to extracts from fish caught in rivers near Pittsburgh. Some of the fish extracts triggered significant growth of these estrogen-sensitive cancer cells. The researchers concluded that people in Pittsburgh at risk for breast cancer may want to “avoid eating locally caught fish.”

    The Potomac and Pittsburgh's rivers are not unusual - these days, you'll find traces of the same sorts of pesticides and industrial chemicals in any major river in America. That these chemicals end up in the fish we eat, and sometimes even in the water we drink, seems a recipe for disaster.

    Photo: Fishing in the Potomac by sosico.

    « Lead: Still in 35 percent of children's products |