ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Eating the rainforest | Main | Climate skeptics getting desperate? »

EPA takes baby steps on lead emissions

May 2, 2008

baby steps for EPA on lead emissionsGood news! The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed new, stricter limits on lead emissions.

Bad news, too, though: the proposed limits, although stronger than what exists now, are weaker than the limits suggested by both an independent panel and EPA's own scientists.

Although the amount of lead in the air has decreased drastically since leaded gasoline was banned in the '70s (from 74,000 tons year to 1,300, according to The Washington Post), even small amounts of lead can have harmful effects on children's development.

Both the independent panel and EPA's scientists said the maximum air-lead content ought to be no higher than ,20 micrograms per cubic foot, and the independent panel also suggested that polluters record their emissions for a single month. EPA's proposal would allow for a range of lead emissions up to .30 micrograms per cubic foot, averaged over three months. It miight not sound like a big difference, but when you're talking about lost IQ points in children, it is.

EPA could have taken a stronger stance on air-lead content. Baby-steps are fine for babies, but when it comes to protecting children's health, we should expect giant leaps from our government. If you live in or near St. Louis, MI or Baltimore, MD, EPA is holding public hearings [pdf] on this proposal in your neck of the woods on June 12th. Once the proposed rule is published in the federal register, EPA will accept comment for 60 days -- I'll keep you posted.

Photo by Sean Dreilinger.

« Eating the rainforest |