ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« A new location for Big Tobacco: universities | Main | LA's compact carbon footprint, with caveats »
Protecting Alaska?
This is one last post by EWG social media intern Akua, who wrapped up her internship here this month. We wish her the best of luck!
The Bureau of Land Management, an agency responsible for the management of federal public lands in the United States, has proposed a 10-year ban on oil drilling in the 430,000 acres north and east of the Teshekpuk Lake in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. The region is home to many bird species as well as over half a million caribou during their migration period. While hailed as a win by many environmentalists, this celebration is somewhat obscuring a larger issue: The territory under protection holds about 800 million barrels of oil; the entire region holds an astounding 2.8 billion barrels of oil.
Essentially this means that while the most sensitive area in the region is being protected under a short-term ban, the proposal essentially opens up many more parts of Alaska for oil drilling. I was originally shocked by the Bush Administration’s sudden decision to embrace a conservation effort, but giving up this coveted piece of land appears to be more of a public relations move than one of genuine concern for the region. If you read the Bureau of Land Management’s official statement on the issue, we don’t seem to be getting that great of a deal. The land being temporarily given up for conservation seems to be just crumbs from a banquet in comparison to the amount of oil that will be made available to companies to lease through the deal.
Also, the ban on mining in the 430,000 acres is only for 10 years -- after which it becomes possible for companies to lease the area for drilling. If the bureau were truly motivated by a desire to conserve the area and protect the Teshekpuk Lake it would turn this ban into law.
Photo: Tern Lake, Alaska by Anita Gould.
Leave a comment