ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« China's great greenwashing | Main | You know you're an inaction plan. . . »

Aussie study finds phthalates in jar lids

June 24, 2008

jarsSometimes it's hard to write about this stuff. Here I am, day and and day out, telling you that food packaged in glass containers is a better alternative to canned food -- and it is. But the results from recent tests by an Australian non-profit suggest that even jars pose potential risks.

It's not the jars themselves, actually, but the metal lids. They're lined with a resinous material that consumer watchdog organization Choice says leaches phthalates into 'runny' foods, especially those with high fat content. They only tested 25 foods, but half of those contained levels of three different phthalates above the EU's permitted levels.

Choice has chosen not to release the specific list of products they tested, but they have suggested guidelines. Avoid food in jars that might slosh against the lid if the food contains more than 4% fat (or 4 grams of fat per 100 grams of food). You can get details about the testing on their website. No word on whether they tested for BPA or not.

What's frustrating is how easy it is to spin this into a consumer issue. Just avoid A, B and C and you'll be fine! But we're hearing that so often these days that soon we'll be avoiding the whole alphabet. Which is why, no matter which way we spin it, this is ultimately an issue for government and industry: we need chemical safety standards. The sooner the better.

Photo by How Can I Recycle This?, an awesome UK-based recycling blog.

PS, some of you are probably wondering about mason jars. Clearly the lids were lined with something, but the Aussie group doesn't seem to have tested them. Remember that if you're canning things at home, you have more control over how much sloshing goes on.

« China's great greenwashing |