ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« LA's compact carbon footprint, with caveats | Main | Mixed Greens 011: Unpretty »

Lead: Bad for brains, bad for society

June 3, 2008

chipped paint. Childhood lead exposure increases risk of arrest for violent crime in adulthood.A new, first-of-its-kind study demonstrates a direct correlation between elevated blood-lead levels and arrests for violent crime. The study looked at blood-lead levels for 250 people from before birth through their seventh year. That data was collected between 1979 and 1991, and recently researchers looked at the criminal arrest records for the same subjects.

The results were clear as day. Higher blood lead levels at any point in childhood were an accurate predictor of arrests for violent crime later in life.

Wait a second. Haven't we seen that before?

The conclusion's basically the same, but the methodology sets this study apart. Previous studies have been criticized for for their indirect measures -- like the one that pointed to a correlation between the ban on leaded gasoline and a worldwide drop in crime rates, or studies that have found elevated blood-lead levels in people who've been arrested. Those studies have presented strong data, but some naysayers have argued that they don't hold water.

Those naysayers will have a harder time denying the connection between lead exposure and violent criminal activity now. The new study produced specific numbers:

The researchers found, for example, that every 5-microgram-per-deciliter increase in blood lead levels at age 6 was accompanied by a 50% increase in the incidence of violent crime later in life.

On top of that, another set of researchers looked at the brain-weight of a sample of subjects from the original study. They found an inverse correlation between blood-lead levels and brain weight -- that is, people with more lead in their systems during childhood also had the smallest brains. The areas of the brain that were most impacted? Those regulating "decision making, impulse control, attention, error detection, task completion and reward-based decision making." Seriously. Could the evidence be any more compelling?

« LA's compact carbon footprint, with caveats |