ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« FDA got it wrong. Here's why. | Main | Back to school: Are we ready? Are we non-toxic? »
Elected officials MIA; Instead, Wal-Mart and Burger King protecting your health
Despite numerous health and consumer safety concerns, California lawmakers fell under the lobbying influence of the chemical industry and rejected the two bills that would ban chemicals from baby bottles, food containers and microwave popcorn bags.
The two measures, Senate Bill 1713 by Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, and Senate Bill 1313, by Sen. Ellen Corbett, D-San Leandro, would have banned two notoriously toxic chemicals PFOA, a key ingredient of Teflon, and BPA, from food containers and packaging, including infant sippie cups and baby bottles.
While numerous retailers, including Wal-Mart and Burger King, decided to remove products containing BPA and PFOA from their shelves and their food packaging respectively, numerous California legislators decided not to show up for the vote. It's true that the weather is very nice and going to the beach sounds pretty appealing, but I, the taxpayer, am outraged that the retail and fast food giants are taking the steps to protect the public, while the elected officials are not.
Corbett's bill, that would have banned the chemical PFOA from food packaging, which has been identified as a likely human carcinogen, fell five votes short of the 41 needed.
11 California legislators did not vote.
Migden's bill, that would ban the use of BPA for products used by children less than three years of age, died on a 27-to-31 vote, with 22 abstentions.
The vote was preceded by the recent eyebrow raising decision by the FDA that exposure to BPA from consumer products is safe for humans. The announcement came out on Friday, while the California vote was on Monday. The FDA, another governmental body financed by the taxpayer, has sided with special interest groups on this issue again.
So, rest assured that while your legislators are napping, the chemical industry is wide awake. They continue to invest millions in propaganda that argues that PFOA and BPA are safe. And sadly, those brain altering chemicals are working on California legislators!
There is no question PFOA and BPA are linked to health problems. Both bills, which were granted reconsideration, must be passed so that Californians are not exposed to these toxic chemicals. Then, we need federal action to protect all Americans.
Leave a comment