ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Enviroblog is a project of EWG Action Fund.

About our authors.


FEED

 Subscribe in a Reader

Subscribe by Email


Mixed Greens
An EWG podcast for environmental health news on the go.


FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

    TIPS

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblg.


    BLOGROLL


    STAY CONNECTED

    Get our monthly eNewsletter, action alerts, & environmental tips. [Privacy policy, About EWG]


    Healthy Home Tips for Parents

    Eco-nomics, the new kind of economics

    Please don't disrupt my endocrines!

    Taking pollution personally


    FEATURED

    Please don't disrupt my endocrines!

    Healthy home tips for parents

    Consumers to FDA: Be there or be square

    Lead: Celebrate its ban, but don't cross it off your list

    Cheatsheet: Bisphenol A

    7 ways to reduce your exposure to PBDEs



    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?


    SEARCH


    ARCHIVE

    « Does environmental conservation imply austerity? | Main | Small fry: Better for the planet, better for your health »

    Gas price relief: Location efficiency

    By Guest

    August 7, 2008

    This post is by EWG's media intern Sameem.

    Right on the heels of gas price hype and a housing crisis, we’re finally being presented with legislation that at least acknowledges the need for a more thorough transit planning.

    On July 15, Representative Blumenauer of Oregon introduced the Transportation and Housing Choices for Gas Price Relief Act of 2008 into the House. Despite lacking a snazzy name, the bill puts forward some big steps in getting federal attention to transit and planning issues around the country.

    In the grand scheme of things, perhaps one of the most influential parts of the legislation is its support for “location-efficient” housing developments. As I mentioned in my last post, only 1 in 5 households in the US are transit accessible. In addition to expanding transit to existing developments, the bill aims to create, maintain, support, and grow communities around existing transit friendly areas. It proposes that mortgage lenders, namely Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, be given specific goals for granting mortgages to properties that are location-efficient. The bill also proposes more grants for developers who want to build affordable housing near transit.

    So now you’ve got your fancy location-efficient residence, and you can hop on to transit and get anywhere you want, right? Probably not. To fill in the gaps in transit systems, or to avoid them all together, more and more commuters are looking to bicycles to get around these days. The bill seeks to spur this on by enticing potential cyclist and their employers with a modest increase in tax credits. Of course an increase in cycle traffic will call for a massive adjustment in road planning, for the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and motorists alike. This readjustment will call for more work and money.

    And this is where the bill needs to shine most. In order for all these fancy pieces to fit together, this bill has the potential to reform the way federal money is spent on transportation. Instead of giving priority to highway construction, a reform in transportation spending should help localities.

    We’ll keep our eyes on this bill as it makes its way through house committees and onward.

    Photo by Striatic.

    « Does environmental conservation imply austerity? |